摘要
伴随设计学科的发展,在教学中加强理论研究的同时,有必要更深入地探究"实践"所具有的独特作用,探索更加有效进行实践的方法。本文首先以芬兰阿尔托大学艺术、设计和建筑学系研究和教学过程中的"实践"为对象,进行了对比分析。发现"实践"在研究中是一种进行探究性分析的手段,在教学中则是一种进行反思性训练的手段,具有不同作用。本文基于"实践"在教学中具有的"反思性训练"作用,在教学中开发应用了一些工具。从教学结果可知,如果在教学中增加辅助思考的工具,会有助于学生进行实践的反思,提升教学效果。
With the development of design discipline, it is necessary to explore the unique role of practice and the ways to improve the practice. First, this paper conducted a comparative analysis of practice in the research and education of Aalto University in Finland. It was found that practice could be seen as a mean of conducting exploratory analysis in research. Practice can be seen as a mean of reflective training in teaching. The practice plays a different role in different areas. Based on the role of reflective training, this paper create some tools in education process. It is clear that adding tools to assist the thinking process can facilitate the self-reflective and enhance the effect of education.
出处
《设计》
2019年第23期81-83,共3页
Design
基金
2019年江苏省研究生教育教学改革课题：基于高水平大学评价指标的社科研究生科研能力培养研究（项目编号JGLX19_104）支持
关键词
实践
教学
设计教育
Practice
Education
Design education
