摘要
"比较历史分析"作为一种社会科学研究方法论,具有深厚的理论和实践渊源,被广泛运用于社会科学的各个领域之中。从比较教育学科发展出发,"比较历史分析"既是传统历史研究法的重新修正和再造,也是对实证和结构功能主义的质疑,并在定量和定性研究相融合的推进中不断发展。它注重因果分析和历史次序过程、融合多种社会科学理论和方法、致力于系统化和情景化比较,为比较教育学科发展提供新的可能。"比较历史分析"启发比较教育研究者从知识本质观和价值观构筑新的知识观,然而其自身的局限性亦需要全面、辩证、理性、客观地分析,以更好地推动新时代比较教育一流学科建设。
As a methodology of social science research, comparative historical analysis originated from abundant theories and practices, and was employed in many fields of social science. Based on the development of comparative education discipline, the comparative historical analysis revised and reconstructed the traditional historical research, and it not only questioned positivism and structuralism, but also the melted qualitative and quantitative research methods. This methodology focused on the process of causal analysis and historical order, integrated a variety of social science theories and methods, and was committed to systematization and situational comparison, providing new possibilities for the development of comparative education discipline. As a result, it inspired the comparative researchers to build up a new epistemology from the angle of knowledge essence and values, as well as reflected its limits in a comprehensive, dialectical, reasonable and objective way. By this means, it helped us facilitate the construction of "world-class" comparative education discipline in the new era.
作者
高皇伟
GAO Huangwei(School of Public Administration and Center for Southeast Asian Studies,South China Normal University,Guangzhou Guangdong 510631)
出处
《比较教育研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第9期52-59,共8页
International and Comparative Education
关键词
比较历史分析
比较教育学
学科发展
方法论
comparative historical analysis
comparative education
development of discipline
methodology
