摘要
《婚姻法司法解释(二)》第24条确立了夫妻共同债务推定规则,虽然有效防止了夫妻双方欺诈债权人的情况发生,但是由于它过于注重交易安全保护债权人的权益,举证责任分配不合理,在实践中极易发生债权人与举债人恶意串通侵害非举债方利益的情形,引发不公平的结果。
Article 24 of the Judicial Interpretation of the Marriage Law ( II) establishes the presumption of Married Couple's Joint Debts,although it effectively prevents the fraud of creditors by both spouses,but because it protects the rights and interests of creditors too much,the burden of proof distribution is unreasonable,in practice,it is very easy for creditors and borrowers to maliciously collude against the interests of non - borrowing parties,Lead to unfair results.
作者
吕彬彬
Lv Binbin(Law School of Huaqiao University,Quanzhou Fujian 362021)
出处
《对外经贸》
2019年第7期104-106,114,共4页
FOREIGN ECONOMIC RELATIONS & TRADE
关键词
夫妻共同债务
推定规则
举证责任
Married Couple's Joint Debts
Presumption Rule
The Burden of Proof
