摘要
夫妻共同债务的认定是审判实践中争议较多的热点问题。针对夫妻工同债务,婚姻法及其司法解释在坚持"债务目的论"的同时,确立了否认共同债务的推定规则。推定规则的法理基础是法定的夫妻共同财产制,而非家事代理。《婚姻法解释二》第24条所确立的夫妻共同债务推定规则不能脱离《婚姻法》第41条的规定加以适用,其在制度设计和价值取向上具有合理性。法官在适用该推定规则时应正确理解其适用前提,合理分配当事人的证明责任,同时应完善夫妻间的追偿制度和共同债务清偿责任制度。
There is a lot of controversy in identifying common debt of a couple in judicial practice. While Chinese Marriage Law and its judicial interpretation holds the teleology that spousal common debt is used for family consumption, they established the presumption rule which may overturn the spousal com- mon obligations. The legal basis of the presumption rule is the marital common property system other than the family agent system. The presumption rule established by Article 24 of The Second Edition of Judicial Interpretation of Marriage Law is rational in design and value orientation, which applies only to the exter- nal property obligations between the couple and the third party. So, we should correctly understand the premise for its application, allocate the burden of proof between the parties and improve the compensation system and common liability system for husband and wife.
作者
汪金兰
龙御天
WANG Jinlan, LONG Yutian
出处
《安徽大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第2期104-112,共9页
Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社科基金一般项目"全球化背景下国际婚姻家庭法律问题研究"(15BFX202)
关键词
夫妻共同债务
推定规则
夫妻共同财产制
家事代理
spousal common obligation
presumption rule
marital common property system
family agent system
