摘要
《婚姻法解释(二)》第二十四条是夫妻共同债务推定规则。该规则不合理地加重了夫妻中非举债方的证明责任,过于重视交易安全而忽略了婚姻安全,过于强调夫妻财产关系的一体性而忽视了家事代理的有限性,过于强调形式公平而忽视了结果公正,而且在理解与适用中也存在偏差。正确适用夫妻共同债务推定规则应着眼于其推定规则的性质,保障夫妻中非举债方有足够的反驳机会,并适度降低其证明标准。从长远看,应修正夫妻共同债务推定规则:婚姻关系存续期间夫妻一方以个人名义在日常家庭事务范围内所负债务,推定为夫妻共同债务,但有相反证据证明不属于夫妻共同债务的除外。
The presumption rule of married couple＇s joint debts is Article 24 of Judicial Interpretation II of the Marriage Law. This rule imposes too much non-debtor＇s burden of proof while it ignores the security of marriage. It overemphasizes the importance of unity of matrimonial property while it ignores the limitation of externalizing marital daily housework. It also overemphasizes formal justice, while it ignores equity as an outcome. Moreover, there are deviations in understanding and applying the rule. To apply the rule correctly, one should pay attention to its status as a presumption rule, non-debtor＇s opportunities to object should be assured, and standards of proof should be reduced properly. In the long run, the presumption rule of married couple＇s joint debts should be revised： a debt held by one party of a couple in his or her own name during marriage should be presumed to be their joint debt, unless there are contrary evidence.
出处
《妇女研究论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第6期66-72,共7页
Journal of Chinese Women＇s Studies
关键词
夫妻共同债务
推定规则
证明责任
日常家庭事务
married couple＇s joint debts
the presumption rule
burden of proof
marital daily housework
