期刊文献+

比伐卢定联合替罗非班对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者冠状动脉介入术中无复流或慢血流的探索性应用 被引量:14

Application of Bivaludine Combined with Tirofiban in Patients with STEMI without Reflow or Slow Blood Flow during Coronary Intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察比伐卢定联合替罗非班冠状动脉内序贯应用对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者冠状动脉介入术(PCI)中无复流或慢血流的影响。方法选择在比伐卢定抗凝下直接PCI术中出现无复流或慢血流的STEMI患者108例,根据术中抗凝药物使用的不同,分为冠脉A组36例、冠脉B组38例、冠脉C组34例。比较3组在PCI术后冠状动脉血流分级、ST段回落情况、左心室舒张末内径(LVEDD)、左室射血分数(LVEF)。评定比较各组的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)及住院期间的出血事件、血小板减少发生率。结果 3组术中及术后TIMI 3级及ST段完全回落比例均以冠脉A组最高,冠脉C组最低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。各组PCI术后3个月和6个月的LVEDD逐渐缩短,LVEF逐渐增加。术后6个月,LVEDD以冠脉A组最短,冠脉C组最长,LVEF以冠脉A组最大,冠脉C组最小,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。冠脉A组、冠脉B组、冠脉C组的出血事件发生率分别为8.33%、5.26%、5.88%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。PCI术后1月内冠脉A组、冠脉B组、冠脉C组的MACE的发生率分别为13.89%、31.58%、41.18%,其中冠脉A组的MACE发生率显著低于冠脉B组和冠脉C组(P<0.05),而冠脉B组和冠脉C组之间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。冠脉A组、冠脉B组、冠脉C组的血小板减少程度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论冠脉内序贯应用比伐卢定及替罗非班在STEMI行PCI中疗效显著,且不增加出血及血小板减少风险,可显著提高患者近期临床疗效。 Objective To observe the effect of sequential intracoronary infusion of bivalirudin and tirofiban on no-reflow or slow blood flow in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) undergoing coronary artery intervention. Methods 108 STEMI patients undergoing no-reflow or slow blood flow during anticoagulation with bivalirudin, according to the different use of anticoagulants during operation, were divided into three groups including coronary artery group A(36 cases), coronary artery group B(38 cases) and coronary artery group C(34 cases).Coronary blood flow classification, ST-segment depression, left ventricular end diastolic diameter(LVEDD) and left ventricular ejection fraction( LVEF) were compared between the three groups after coronary angiography.The major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE) and the bleeding events during hospitalization and the incidence of thrombocytopenia were assessed. Results The proportions of TIMI 3 grade and ST-segment in the three groups were all highest in coronary artery group A, the lowest in coronary artery group C. The difference was statistically significant(P <0.05). At 3 months and 6 months after PCI, LVEDD gradually decreased and LVEF gradually increased.After 6 months, LVEDD was the shortest in coronary artery group A, and coronary artery group C was the longest.The LVEF coronary artery was the largest in coronary artery group A, and the smallest in coronary artery group C.The difference was statistically significant(P <0.05). The incidences of bleeding in coronary artery group A, B and C were 8.33%, 5.26% and 5.88%. The difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). The incidences of MACE in coronary artery group A, B and C were 13.89%, 31.58% and 41.18%. Within 1 month after PCI, the incidence of MACE in coronary artery group A was significantly lower than that in coronary artery group B and coronary artery group C(P <0.05), but there was no significant difference between coronary artery group B and coronary artery group C(P >0.05). There wa
作者 郭晓丽 GUO Xiaoli(Department of Cardiology,Shangqiu City Hospital of TCM,Henan Shangqiu 476000,China)
出处 《中国药物警戒》 2019年第5期260-264,269,共6页 Chinese Journal of Pharmacovigilance
关键词 比伐卢定 替罗非班 ST段抬高型心肌梗死 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 bivalirudin tirofiban ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献117

  • 1郭路芬,彭亚光,李庆祥,贺建华,赵冬,洪昭光.急性心肌梗死发病至就诊时间与预后的关系[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(1):40-43. 被引量:76
  • 2无.慢性稳定性心绞痛诊断与治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(3):195-206. 被引量:2087
  • 3胡大一,孙艺红.优化的药物治疗是冠心病二级预防的基石[J].中华内科杂志,2007,46(6):442-443. 被引量:42
  • 4杨新春,张大鹏,王乐丰,徐立,葛永贵,王红石,李惟铭,倪祝华,夏昆,连勇,薛永利,马利祥.冠状动脉内应用国产替罗非班对急性ST段抬高心肌梗死急诊介入治疗后心肌灌注和临床预后的影响[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(6):517-522. 被引量:74
  • 5Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery ( EACTS ), European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Wijns W, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J,2010 , 31:2501-2555. 被引量:1
  • 6Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/ SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Circulation, 2011, 124 :e574-651. 被引量:1
  • 7Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2011,58 :e123-210. 被引量:1
  • 8Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation ( EuroSCORE ). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1999,16:9-13. 被引量:1
  • 9Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med, 2009,360:961- 972. 被引量:1
  • 10Peterson ED, Dai D, DeLong ER, et al. Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coil Cardiol,2010,55:1923-1932. 被引量:1

共引文献563

同被引文献135

引证文献14

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部