期刊文献+

电话回访制对冠脉支架术后患者自我护理能力的影响 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的电话回访对冠脉支架术后患者自我护理能力产生的有益影响。方法我科2010年冠状动脉支架术后患者共256例,随机分为电话回访组和非回访组(每位患者均知情同意并签署协议)。电话回访组通过责任护士护士系统的电话回访对患者进行冠心病二级预防的健康教育,讲解内容包括规范用药、控制危险因素及生活方式改善的必要性等,来提高经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention,PCI)术后患者自我护理能力,非回访组仅复查时由医生交代相关注意事项及药物的应用。最后评价两组患者的自我护理能力的差异及两组患者临床事件的发生率。结果电话回访组患者自我护理能力明显优于非回访组。结论电话回访可明显提高冠心病支架术后患者自我护理能力,并降低患者临床事件的发生率。电话回访为一种简便、快捷、有效的冠心病二级预防措施。
出处 《医学信息(医学与计算机应用)》 2014年第25期116-117,118,共3页 Medical Information
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献13

  • 1中国高血压防治指南起草委员会.中国高血压防治指南.高血压杂志,2000,:94-112. 被引量:64
  • 2Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery ( EACTS ), European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Wijns W, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J,2010 , 31:2501-2555. 被引量:1
  • 3Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/ SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Circulation, 2011, 124 :e574-651. 被引量:1
  • 4Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2011,58 :e123-210. 被引量:1
  • 5Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation ( EuroSCORE ). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1999,16:9-13. 被引量:1
  • 6Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med, 2009,360:961- 972. 被引量:1
  • 7Peterson ED, Dai D, DeLong ER, et al. Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coil Cardiol,2010,55:1923-1932. 被引量:1
  • 8Online STS fish calculator [ S/OL]. [ 2012-01-01 ]. http:// riskcalc, sts. org/STSWebRiskCalc273/de, aspx. 被引量:1
  • 9Mehta SR, Tanguay JF, Eikelboom JW, et al. Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes ( CURRENT-OASIS 7 ): a randomised factorial trial. Lancet,2010,376 : 1233-1243. 被引量:1
  • 10Mehta SR, Granger CB, Eikelboom JW, et al. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the OASIS-5 trial. J Am Cell Cardiol,2007,50 : 1742-1751. 被引量:1

共引文献425

同被引文献36

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部