摘要
夫妻间婚内赠与纠纷案件的司法处理较为混乱,《婚姻法》第十九条与《婚姻法司法解释三》第六条的适用标准模糊,应通过解释确定各自的适用范围。《婚姻法》第十九条规定的约定财产制为选择式,夫妻双方约定财产归一方所有的情形非该条规范对象。《婚姻法司法解释三》第六条仅适用于房屋的全部赠与,准用《合同法》第一百八十六条后不属于该条第二款"道德义务性质的赠与",在未变更登记前可任意撤销。夫妻间动产赠与不一定涉及物权变动,有时仅是共有财产形态的转化,涉及到举证责任的分配和举证不能时不利后果的承担。
The judicial handling of the cases of gift between couples during marriage is confusing.The application standards of the No.19 article of Marriage Law and the No.6 article of Judicial Interpretation of Marriage Law(Ⅲ)are not clear,which should be interpreted to determine their respective scope of application.The agreed property system stipulated in the No.19 article of Marriage Law is a selective mode,and the situation that couples agree that the property belongs to one party is not the object of the article.The No.6 article of Judicial Interpretation of Marriage Law(Ⅲ)only applies to the situation that one party give the whole house to the other,but this kind of gift does not conform to"gift of moral obligation",stipulated in Section 2 of No.186 article of Contract Law of the PRC,so that it can be arbitrarily revoked before the registration is changed.When it comes to the movable property as gift between couples,it does not necessarily involve changes in property rights,sometimes only referring to the form conversion of joint property,involving the distribution of the burden of proof and the unfavorable consequences of lack of proof.
作者
孙亚捷
SUN Yɑjie(School of Law,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan Hubei 430073,China)
出处
《乐山师范学院学报》
2019年第1期88-96,共9页
Journal of Leshan Normal University
关键词
夫妻间婚内赠与
夫妻财产制协议
赠与合同
Gift Between Couples During Marriage
Matrimonial Property Agreement
Contract of Gift
