摘要
夫妻法定财产制原则上产生直接财产变动效果,会对财产法上具体财产变动公示规则产生影响。即使对于那些能够进行共同共有表征的财产来说,身份表征与财产上的共同共有表征在功能上也无法相互替代。具体财产上的共有公示虽然无法表征婚后所得共同制,但其仍然具有独立的价值,能够产生完整的公信力。对于不能进行准共同共有表征的财产,除强化利用这样特殊的法政策考量外,应一般性承认处分限制。夫妻约定财产制虽然具有排斥法定财产制的效果,但其完全无法进行公示,只能依赖善意规则对第三人发生效力。婚内财产分割协议所生财产变动应当依据财产法上的规则进行公示,但是出于保护第三人对婚后所得共同制权利归属效果的合理信赖,公示所生公信力会被削弱。基于离婚财产分割协议的财产变动并不存在公示障碍,但公示所生公信力亦会受之前婚姻关系的影响。在确定夫妻实施的财产法律行为所生财产变动公示效果时,第三人对婚后所得共同制权利归属效果的信赖并不具有当然的优先保护地位,否则会反噬婚姻关系当事人的人格。父母子女关系本身并无共同所有效力,不能作为削弱财产变动公示公信力的依据。
The default matrimonial property regime has in principle a direct property transfer effect,which has an impact on the rules of property law regarding the publicity of property transfer.Even for those properties that can be publicized as co-ownership,the publicity of marriage and the publicity of co-ownership in property are functionally irreplaceable.Although it is not possible to represent the common system of marital income from the publicity of co-ownership,it still has an independent value and can generate complete reliability.For property that cannot be publicized as co-ownership,restrictions on disposition should be recognized in general,except for special policy considerations such as promoting the use of a property.Although the contractual matrimonial property regime has the effect of excluding the default matrimonial regime,it is completely incapable of publicity and can only rely on the rule of good faith to take effect on the third party.Property transfer resulting from a marital property division agreement should be publicized in accordance with the rules of property law,but the reliability of publicity is weakened by the need to protect the reasonable reliance of third parties on the effect of vesting rights in the community of acquisitions.There is no obstacle to the publicity of property transfer based on the divorce contract,but the reliability of publicity is also affected by the previous marital relationship.In determining the effect of publicizing the transfer of property resulting from legal acts of property performed by spouses,third party's reliance on the effect of attribution of assets in the community of acquisitions regime does not certainly take the priority of protection over the publicity of property,or else it may impair the personalities of the spouses.The parent-child relationship does not in itself have the effect of joint ownership and cannot be used as a basis for undermining the reliability of the publicity of property transfer.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
北大核心
2024年第2期84-103,共20页
Law and Social Development
基金
2023年度中南财经政法大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目青年教师创新研究专项(2722023BY009)
国家社会科学基金青年项目“体系视角下婚姻家庭关系法律适用问题研究”(18CFX075)的阶段性成果。
关键词
身份关系
财产变动
公示公信
善意判断
Family Relations
Transfer of Property
Reliability of Publicity
Identification of Good Faith