期刊文献+

选择性单囊胚移植在小于40岁患者新鲜周期中的应用 被引量:11

Application of elective single blastocyst transfer in fresh cycle of women under 40 years old
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨新鲜周期小于40岁患者选择性单囊胚和卵裂期胚胎移植的妊娠结局。方法回顾性分析2016年1月至2017年10月在广东省中医院生殖医学科行体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)的405例患者的治疗情况,根据移植时间和方式不同分成两组:选择性单囊胚移植组(eSBT组,101例)和卵裂期胚胎移植组(D3ET组,304例)。结果两组患者女方年龄、男方年龄、基础FSH、基础E2、不孕年限、女性BMI、不孕因素比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);eSBT组和D3ET组相比,除Gn使用天数外,Gn使用剂量、获卵数、可利用胚胎数、优质胚胎数、受精卵数及移植胚胎数差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);两组患者的临床妊娠率和流产率均无统计学差异(P>0.05);eSBT组的着床率显著高于D3ET组(55.4%vs.41.3%,P<0.01);eSBT组未出现多胎妊娠,而D3ET组多胎妊娠率为35.6%,两组差异极显著(P<0.01);eSBT组和D3ET组患者活产率(45.5%vs.49.7%)、男女性别比(110vs.110)、胎儿畸形发生率(2.2%vs.1.6%)差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);eSET组早产率略低于D3ET组(13.0%vs.21.2%),但差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05);eSET组双胎出生率(0vs.25.2%)及出生低体重儿发生率(13.0%vs.29.1%)均显著低于D3ET组(P<0.05)。结论在小于40岁预后好的患者中,选择性单囊胚移植可保证临床妊娠率和活产率的同时有效降低多胎妊娠。 Objective:To compare the pregnant outcome of elective single blastocyst transfer(eSBT)and cleavage-stage embryo transfer(Day 3 ET)in women undergoing fresh embryo transfer under 40 years old.Methods:The data of 405 cycles of fresh embryo transfer of IVF/ICSI treatment including eSBT(n=101)and Day 3 ET(n=304)in the Department of Reproductive Medicine,Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine from January 2016 to October 2017.Results:There were no significant differences in female age,male age,baseline level of FSH and E 2,duration of infertility,female BMI and infertility factors between the two groups(P >0.05).There were significant differences in total gonadotrophin dose used,numbers of oocytes retrieved,embryos available,high quality embryos,fertilized oocytes and embryos transferred(P<0.05)except the days of gonadotropin used(P >0.05).The clinical pregnancy rate and abortion rate were not significantly different between the eSBT group and the Day 3 ET group(P >0.05).The implantation rate of the eSBT group was significantly higher than that of Day 3 ET group(55.4%vs.41.3%,P<0.01).No multiple pregnancy occurred in the eSBT group,whereas the multiple pregnancy rate of the Day 3 ET group was 35.6%;the difference was significant between the two groups(P<0.01).There were no significant differences in live birth rate(45.5%vs.49.7%),male-female ratio(110 vs.110),fetal malformation rate(2.2%vs.1.6%)between eSBT group and Day 3 ET group(P >0.05).However,the rate of preterm birth was slightly lower in the eSBT group(13.0%),as compared to the Day 3 ET group(21.2%),but the difference was not significant.The difference of the twin birth rate between the two groups was significantly different(0 vs.25.2%,P<0.01).The incidence of low birth weight infants was significantly lower in the eSBT group than that in the Day 3 ET group(13.0%vs.29.1%,P<0.05).Conclusions:Elective single blastocyst transfer can ensure the pregnancy rate and live birth rate while effectively reducing multiple pregnancy in the women with a good prog
作者 谢妍 杨冬宇 陈旭龙 李思楠 周文 周欢群 袁启龙 陆杉 XIE Yan;YANG Dong-yu;CHEN Xu-long;LI Si-nan;ZHOU Wen;ZHOU Huan-qun;YUAN Qi-long;LU Shan(Department of Reproductive Medicine,Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou510000)
出处 《生殖医学杂志》 CAS 2019年第2期140-145,共6页 Journal of Reproductive Medicine
基金 广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(A2017152)
关键词 新鲜周期 单囊胚 胚胎移植 多胎率 Fresh cycle Single blastocyst Embryo transfer Multiple pregnancy rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献43

  • 1Task ESHRE. Force on ethics and law. Ethical issues related to multiples pregnancies in medically assisted procreation[J]. Hum Reprod, 2003,18 : 1976-1979. 被引量:1
  • 2Thurin A, Hauskerr J, Hillensjo T, et al. Elective single- embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization[J]. N Engl J Med, 2004,351 : 2392-2402. 被引量:1
  • 3Lukassen H,Braat D, Wetzels A, et al. Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomised controlled trial [J]. Hum Reprod, 2005,20:702-708. 被引量:1
  • 4Paparkolaou EG, Camus M, Kolibianakis, et al. In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage- stage embryos[J]. N Engl J Med,2006,354:1139-1146. 被引量:1
  • 5Blake DA,Farquhar CM, Johnson N, et al. Cleavage stage versus blastoeyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007,17 :CD002118. 被引量:1
  • 6Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, et al. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer[J]. Fertil Steril 2000,73 : 1155-1158. 被引量:1
  • 7Tiitinen A,Unkila-Ka!lio L, Halttunen M, et al. Impact of elective single embryo transfer on the twin pregnancy rate [J]. Hum Reprod,2003,18:1449-1453. 被引量:1
  • 8Alper MM, Brinsden P, Fischer R, et al. To blastocyst or not to blastocyst? That is the question[J]. Hum Reprod, 2001, 16:617-619. 被引量:1
  • 9van Montfoort AP, Fiddelers AA, Janssen JM, et al. In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Hum Reprod, 2006,21 : 338-343. 被引量:1
  • 10Nakagawa K,Nishi Y, Sugiyama R, et al. Elective single cleavage-stage embryo transfer need not result in lower pregnancy rates compared to double cleavage-stage embryo transfer[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2010,36:777-782. 被引量:1

共引文献88

同被引文献58

引证文献11

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部