摘要
本文把中国社会学学科史分解为社会学思想传入和翻译阶段(1895—1920)、社会学早期发展阶段(1921—1952)、社会学恢复阶段(1979—1998)和社会学常规化阶段(1999—2018)四个内部分期,并对这四个时段内社会学本土化(运动)的源起和表现特征做了初步阐析,认为外部学术要素卷入(或中外学术态势对比)、内生学术结构特征的变动和技术及其他支持体系的约束(或促进),构成了理解社会学本土化议题之兴起和形塑的知识社会学框架的三大核心要件。文章继而对当代社会学本土化—国际化/全球化争议中我们认为较为中肯的几个代表性意见进行了特别回顾。最后,文章认为,在当代中国社会学发展演进的宏大脉络中,本土化和国际化/全球化之争并不具有本体论意义上的相关性,而毋宁说其表征的是学者们在各自学力养成基础上的一个"价值有涉"的立场和偏好而已。因此,无论是在研究议题上,还是在研究方法上,一个兼容并包的学术原则将或者调和持不同立场者间的争端,或者推动中国社会学的研究走向一个新的学术高度。
This thesis divides the history of China’s sociology into four periods:the introduction and translation periods from 1895 to 1920,early development period from 1921 to 1952,renaissance period from 1979 to 1998 and conventionalization period from 1999 to 2018.Besides,the thesis also analyzes the origin and characteristic of indigenization of sociology in different periods.The conclusion is that participation of external academic factors,internal change of academic structure characteristic and restriction or promotion of other support systems are three core elements which constitute sociology knowledge framework to understand the popularity and manifestation of sociology indigenization issues.This thesis also illustrates typical opinions in controversy of modern sociology indigenization,internalization or globalization.W e think that in the development of China’s sociology,the controversy about indigenization,internalization or globalization is not relevant when it comes to ontology.It is just scholars’preference based on their own academic attainments.Therefore,taking absorbing anything and everything as principle of research subjects or research methods may reconcile controversy and promote research of China’s sociology to realize new academic achievements.
出处
《济南大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2019年第1期5-16,157,共13页
Journal of University of Jinan:Social Science Edition
