摘要
在证据不足无罪案例分析基础上,对审查判断证据、认定案件事实不同的思维方式进行类型化归纳。有口供的证据不足无罪判决和无口供的证据不足无罪判决,审查判断证据的方式有明显差异。根据裁判者内心无罪确信程度,证据不足无罪判决可分为无罪确信形成型、有罪质疑形成型和无罪怀疑形成型三种类型。通过典型案例的类案研究,为证据不足无罪判决形成裁判基准提供参考,以期防范冤案功能得到强化。
On the basis of the analysis of innocent cases with insufficient evidence,the types of thinking methods for reviewing and judging evidence and determining the facts of the case are summarized.There are obvious differences in the way in which the evidence of oral confession is examined and judged.According to the degree of conviction of innocence in the hearts of judges,it can be divided into three types:conviction of innocence,questioning of guilt and doubt of innocence.Through the case study of typical cases,it provides reference for the establishment of judgment benchmark for acquittal judgment with insufficient evidence in order to strengthen the function of preventing unjust cases.
作者
徐阳
张蕾
Xu Yang;Zhang Lei(School of Law,Liaoning University,Shenyang 110036,China)
出处
《辽宁师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
2019年第1期1-7,共7页
Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"刑事诉讼法学方法论及运用"(13YJC820087)
2017年辽宁特聘教授基金项目"我国刑事诉讼法基本原则体系的学理构建与制度展开"
关键词
证据不足
类型化
口供
无罪确信
insufficient evidence
categorization
oral confession
innocent conviction
