摘要
司法适度介入高校内部治理,有效保障广大师生的基本权利,已经成为社会共识。但司法在什么条件下可以介入大学事务,介入哪些事务、如何介入、介入的限度和强度等等,国内尚未形成权威意见,司法实践中由于缺乏具体的操作标准,导致"同案不同判"的现象大量存在。如何在全面推进依法治国的大背景下处理好尊重大学自治与接受司法监督合理边界问题,已成为理论与实务界关注的焦点。本文从把握"司法权介入"和"高校内部治理"之间的关系、处理好能动与克制之间的边界问题出发,在司法权介入高校内部治理的强度展开类型化分析,以期寻找我国司法权介入高校内部治理的合理限度、科学方法和具体方式。
It has become a social consensus that the judiciary should intervene appropriately in the autonomous running of a universities or colleges and the protection of basic rights of faculty and students. However, there is still no authoritative opinions with respect to when should the judiciary intervene in University or college affairs, what affairs should be intervened in, how to intervene, as well as the limitations and intensity of intervention, etc. Because of the lack of standards of operation in such practice, there are a large number of cases with “ different verdicts for the same case”. How to find the balance between respecting university or college s autonomy and accepting judicial supervision has become the focus both in the field of theory and practice under the background of promoting governing the country by law. Looking into the relationship between “judicial intervention ” and “university or college internal governance” and the boundary between being active and restraining, this paper makes a typological analysis on the intensity of judicial intervention in the internal governance of universities or colleges in order to find out the reasonable extent, scientific method and practical approach of judicial intervention in their governance.
作者
魏海深
WEI Hai-shen(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001China)
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第12期114-125,共12页
Hebei Law Science
基金
河南省政府决策研究招标课题<高校治理的司法介入及其法治限度研究>(2016B276)
关键词
司法介入
高校内部治理
大学自治
学术自由
judicial intervention
internal governance of universities or colleges
university or colleges autonomy
academic freedom
