摘要
目的:探讨干化学分析仪法与显微镜手工法在尿常规检测中的应用效果。方法:收治接受尿常规检验患者186例,均进行尿液干化学分析仪法和显微镜手工法进行尿常规检测。结果:显微镜手工法尿蛋白、白细胞阳性率较干化学分析仪法高,红细胞阳性率较尿液干化学分析仪法低(P<0.05)。结论:在尿常规检验中,干化学分析仪法与显微镜手工法比较,存在一定优势。
Objective:To explore the effect of analysis and manual microscopy in the routine urine test.Methods:186 patients receiving routine urine test were selected.They were treated with urine dry chemical analyzer and manual microscopy.Results:The positive rate of urine protein and white blood cell by manual microscopy was higher than that of dry chemical analyzer,and the positive rate of red blood cell was lower than that of urine dry chemical analyzer(P<0.05).Conclusion:In the routine urine test,the chemical analyzer has some advantages compared with the manual method of microscope.
作者
柯丽霞
Ke Lixia(Clinical Laboratory,Huangshigang Community Health Service Center of Huangshi City,Hubei Province 435002)
出处
《中国社区医师》
2018年第11期100-100,102,共2页
Chinese Community Doctors
关键词
尿常规
干化学分析仪法
显微镜手工法
Urine routine
Dry chemical analyzer
Manual method of microscope
