摘要
我国传统立法采用绝对确定法定刑的立法模式,在这种立法模式下,刑名涵摄力低,难以应对现实中案件的复杂性,司法实践中有时会遭遇"罪有正条,刑无正条"的量刑困境。我国传统法律设置了比附制度,作为绝对确定法定刑立法模式的配套制度,增强了法律的适用性。同时,比附的适用带来了司法官滥用司法裁量权的问题,我国古代在司法官的自由裁量权的制约机制与威慑机制方面建立了相关的配套制度,通过对权力运用的合理规范与程序的严格过滤,使得司法官的裁判权能够得到制度性约束,同时又能保障司法官的自由裁量权的落实,彰显了刑事裁断的规范性与灵活性,这能够为我们当下正在进行的量刑规范化改革如何适度约束法官的自由量刑权提供智识上的资源。
The traditional legislation of China adopted the legislative mode of absolute determination of statutory punishment.In this legislative mode,the criminal name had low absorptive power.So it was difficult to deal with the complex case in reality.And in judicial practice,judges sometimes encountered the dilemma of＂crime has a correct article,punishment has not a correct article＂.The traditional law set up the system of comparison,which was the supporting system for absolute determination of statutory punishment,and enhanced the applicability of the law.At the same time,the application of comparison brought about the abuse of judicial discretion by judges.In ancient China,the supporting systems were established in the restraint mechanism and deterrence mechanism of the discretionary power of judges.Through the reasonable norms and the strict filtration of procedures for the use of power,the judicial power of judges could be subject to institutional constraints,and at the same time,it could guarantee the implementation of the discretion of the magistrates,which demonstrated the normative and flexible nature of the criminal adjudication.This can provide intellectual resources for our current reform of sentencing standardization on how to restrict judges＇ right of free sentencing appropriately.
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第5期91-100,共10页
Journal of Social Sciences
基金
教育部青年基金项目"论中国传统法律中比附的合理性"(项目编号:15YJC820018)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
绝对确定法定刑
立法模式
罪刑关系
自由裁量权
Absolute Determination of Statutory Punishment
Legislative Model
Relationship between Crime and Punishment
Discretion
