摘要
中国传统法律采用绝对法定刑的立法模式,法条的构成要件极为具体、细致,这种具体、细致的规定使得同一类案件的不同表现形态在立法中无法相应地表达,法律罪名的具体化导致其涵摄案件的范围狭窄,司法实践中会出现"罪无正条"的问题。为了解决这个问题,实践中运用比附的技术很合理地弥补了我国古代法律罪名涵摄力低的一面。比附定罪的思维本质是我国古代的推类思维在司法领域的运用。推类思维中的"类可推"是比附定罪思维合理性的基础,而"类不可必推"又使得比附定罪思维具有或然性的特征,"察类"则是比附定罪思维可靠性的保证。
Chinese Traditional law adopted the legislative model of absolute legal punishment. The absolute legal punishment was directly related to the very specific and detailed constituent elements of the law, which made different manifestations of the same type of case not correspondexpression in legislation. The specific legal offense led to narrow range of including cases and there was the problem of ＂sin no positive article＂ in traditionaljudieial practice. In practice, the use of analogy technologysolved this problem reasonably. The thinking essence of the convicting through analogy was the application of the thinking of＂ push class＂ in the judicial fields. ＂Category being pushed＂ is the basis of the rationality of the thought of the convicting through analogy. ＂Category being not pushed inevitably＂ makes the thought of the convicting through analogy have the characteristics of probability. ＂Checking class＂ ensure the reliability of the thought of the convicting through analogy.
出处
《政法论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期52-62,共11页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
作者主持的2015年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目<论中国传统法律中比附的合理性>(项目批准号:15YJC820018)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
推类思维
比附定罪
合理性
或然性
可靠性
the thought of pushing class
convict through analogy
rationality
probability
reliability
