期刊文献+

监察体制改革背景下留置措施与刑事诉讼制度的衔接 被引量:6

Connection Between Lien and Criminal Procedures Under the Background of Reform of the Supervision System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 党的十九大报告提出,制定国家监察法,依法赋予监察委员会职责权限和调查手段,用留置取代"两规"措施。留置措施是国家监察体制改革中新出现的权力执行方式,又是涉及公民人身自由的一项强制性措施。如何在立法中设立留置措施,使其既能充分发挥调查公职人员违法犯罪的作用,又能有效保障被调查人的合法权利?首先必须明确留置措施的创制来源与权力属性,以明晰出台该措施的目的;其次要科学界定留置措施的行使主体、对象、期限、场所,保证其不偏离法治的轨道;最后,有必要从留置措施的决定程序、律师介入可能性、折抵刑期、救济措施等方面明晰该制度与刑事诉讼制度的合理衔接,切实保障被调查人的合法权益。 Report of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China proposed the formulation of the state supervi-sion law, which gives the supervisory committee responsibilities, powers and means of investigation according to law, replacingthe “double punishment”with lien measures. The lien measures are new ways of power implementation in the reform of thestate supervision system, and also a compulsory measure involving the freedom of citizens. How can we set up lien measures inlegislation so that it can give full play to the role of officials in investigating crimes and effectively protect the legitimate rights ofthe investigated? The creation of source and power properties must be clear in order to make clear the purpose of the measure;second, lien should be scientifically defined as regard the subject, object, time, and place, in order to ensure that it does notdeviate from the orbit of the rule of law; finally, it is necessary to reasonably formulate the decision procedure, lawyer interven-tion to be made impossible, allowance sentence, relief measures and the connection with criminal proceedings to be clearly de-fined in order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the person under investigation.
出处 《廉政文化研究》 2018年第1期1-8,共8页 Anti-corruption and Integrity Culture Studies
基金 浙江省高校重大人文社科攻关计划项目
关键词 留置措施 刑事诉讼 律师介入 救济程序 lien measures criminal procedure counsel intervention relief program
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献21

共引文献555

同被引文献66

引证文献6

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部