摘要
"内圣开出新外王"是牟宗三理论的核心,"良知坎陷论"则是其"内圣开出新外王"的关键,但此说受到两个不同方向的质疑:一个是顺着良知坎陷的逻辑,质疑良知为何坎陷、能否坎陷以及如何坎陷;另一个是逆着良知坎陷的逻辑,质疑这是"良知的傲慢",是本质主义的思维方式。这两个质疑都有一定道理,但牟宗三的"良知坎陷论"试图在儒学的理论体系中打造一个接通并融摄科学的思想结点。据此,良知不能代替科学,故不应束缚科学的自由发展;科学在自由发展的前提下,也不能背离和失去良知。
＂Inner Sageliness opens new Outer Kingliness＂ is the core of Mou Zongsan＇ s theory, to which the thought of conscience self-negation is the key. But this thought is criticized from two different aspects ： one is to follow the logic of Mou and to question why, whether could or how conscience self-negates; another is to be against the logic of Mou and to treat conscience self-negation as the arrogance of mind, which follows the mode of essentialist thinking. There are some reasons for these two doubts, but Mou Zongsan＇ s theory of conscience self-negation is trying to create an ideological junction to connect and integrate science in the Confucian theoretical system. Accordingly, conscience can not take the place of science, and thus the development of science should not be shackled; under the premise of free development, science can not deviate from and lose conscience.
出处
《科学技术哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期117-122,共6页
Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基金
国家社科基金项目"工程正义视域下‘邻避冲突’及其防范研究"(15BZX031)
关键词
牟宗三
坎陷
良知
科学
Zongsan
self-nagation
conscience
science
