摘要
目的探讨不同预处理方法在复用管腔器械清洗中的应用效果。方法将复用管腔器械包括外科吸引器、宫腔吸引器等管腔器械总共638件,随机分为常规组(n=319)和实验组(n=319)。常规组采用酶浸泡做预处理后,结合刷洗和全自动清洗机清洗,实验组采用碱性清洗剂浸泡做预处理后,结合刷洗和全自动清洗机清洗。通过长棉签检测、ATP生物荧光法检测清洗效果。结果目测棉签检测结果显示,实验组的清洗方法检测合格率高于常规组。经两种方法清洗后器械的ATP生物荧光检测结果均达到合格标准,实验组的RLU值合格率优于常规组。结论在复用管腔器械的清洗中,采用碱性清洗剂浸泡预处理后再结合刷洗和全自动清洗机的处理方法效果更佳。
Objective To compare the cleaning effect of two different pretreatment methods on reused lumen instruments. Methods Totally 638 lumen instruments of surgical aspirator and intrauterine aspirator were randomly divided into routine group and experimental group. In the routine group,319 instruments were scrubbed and automated cleaning after soaking with enzymatic cleaner. In the experimental group,319 instruments were scrubbed and automatic cleaning after soaking with alkaline cleaner. The cleaning effect was detected by long swab test and ATP bioluminescence method. Results The result of visual inspection showed that the qualified rate of cleaning method in experimental group was higher than that in routine group. The ATP bioluminescence test results of the instruments met the standard after cleaning two methods,and the qualified rate of RLU value in the experimental group was obviously superior to that of the conventional group. Conclusion The method of scrub and automated cleaning after soaking with alkaline cleaner is better in cleaning of reused lumen instruments.
出处
《中西医结合护理（中英文）》
2017年第11期38-39,共2页
Journal of Clinical Nursing in Practice
关键词
复用管腔器械
预处理
清洗效果
消毒
reused lumen instruments
pretreatment method
cleaning effect
sterilization
