摘要
当前形势下一些新的复制发行行为给司法认定带来了很多困惑。应当准确界定民事侵权行为与侵犯著作权罪的界限。相同与相似在属性上具有本质的差别。网络游戏软件的盗版侵权,鉴定为实质性相似不能等同为相同,不能简单地认定为复制发行。侵犯著作权罪之复制行为中"相同"的认定应当主要考虑两点:是否改变作者署名、作品名称;是否为作品内容的直接再现。
Nowadays, the emergence of new methods of reproduction has brought many problems to judicial determination. The boundary between civil infringement and copyright crime should be clearly defined. Being identical and being similar is fundamentally different. In terms of infringing the online game copyright, substantially similar is quite different from identical by nature; it is therefore cannot simply regard similarity as reproduction or distribution. The identification of ＂being identical＂ in copyright crime should consider two major points： whether to change the author＇s signature and the title of the work; and whether the content of the work is reproduced straightforwardly.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第10期53-58,共6页
Intellectual Property
基金
河北省社会科学基金项目"基层司法改革研究(HB14FX017)"
关键词
著作权
复制发行
实质性相似
copyright
copy and distribution
substantial similarity
