期刊文献+

基于语料库的美国智库涉华话语的隐喻建构研究 被引量:5

A Study of the Construction of Metaphors of the CNAS's Political Dialogues Concerning China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 隐喻不仅是语言的表征,更是人类认知的重要组成部分。隐喻触及到不同概念域之间有拣选性的映射,对它的行使和理解是无意识的,其主观性不容易被发现。政治语篇通常是使用大批的隐喻,将政治和现实具体化,为拟定战略或实施行动制造舆论。本文搜集美国智库新美国安全中心涉华政治话语语篇,自建434.6389万字的语料库。该研究利用批评性话语分析理论,剖析新美国安全中心涉华话语,重点探讨涉华话语中隐喻使用的类别、说服功效及其有关的话语策略。分析表明:新美国安全中心涉华话语所用的隐喻类型集中在冲突隐喻、建筑隐喻、移动隐喻、情感隐喻、科技隐喻、身体隐喻、教育隐喻、地理环境隐喻、饮食隐喻、生物体隐喻和艺术隐喻等方面。 Metaphor,which is not only a representation of language, but also a crucial component of human cognition, involves the selective mapping between different conceptual domains. Its use and understanding are often unconscious, and its subjectivity is not easy to perceive. Metaphors are widely used in political discourse to conceptualize and convey abstract politics and reality, in order to create public opinion for some strategy, policy or action. To analysis the different metaphors types, this paper collects and constructs a 4,346,389-word corpus of the Center for a New American Security(CNAS), a US think tank, before the critical discourse analysis theory is employed as a framework to analyze critical metaphors in CNAS, focusing on the categories, persuasive functions and related discourse policies. The analysis shows that the types of conceptual metaphors employed include conflict metaphor, architectural metaphor, mobile metaphor, emotional metaphor, technological metaphor, physical metaphor, educational metaphor, geographical and environmental metaphor, diet metaphor, organism metaphor, artistic metaphor and the like.
作者 王梦晓 支永碧 WANG Mengxiao ZHI Yongbi(College of Foreign Languages, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou Jiangsu 215009, China)
出处 《吉林省教育学院学报》 2017年第10期149-156,共8页 Journal of Jilin Provincial Institute of Education
基金 江苏省大学生科研创新计划省重点资助项目"基于语料库的美国智库涉华战略话语批评性研究"(项目编号:201610332023Z) 江苏省社科基金重点项目"美国对华政策语料库建设与批评性研究"(课题号:16YYA002)阶段性成果之一
关键词 新美国安全中心 涉华政治话语 语料库 概念隐喻 批评性话语分析 the Center for a New American Security political discourses conceming China corpus conceptual metaphor critical discourse analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献168

  • 1王治敏.隐喻的计算研究与进展[J].中文信息学报,2006,20(4):16-24. 被引量:7
  • 2黄孝喜,周昌乐.隐喻理解的计算模型综述[J].计算机科学,2006,33(8):178-183. 被引量:7
  • 3[3]胡曙中.英汉修辞比较研究[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,1994. 被引量:5
  • 4[1]Wilson,John.Political Discourse[A].In D.Schiffrin,et al.(eds.).The Handbook of Discourse Analysis[C].Oxford,UK:Blackwell Publishing,2001.238. 被引量:1
  • 5[2]Sykes,M.Discrimination in Discourse[A].In van Dijk T.A (ed.).Handbook of Discourse Analysis,Vol.4[C].London:Academic Press,1985.87. 被引量:1
  • 6[3]Kress,G.Ideological Structures in Discourse[A].In van Dijk T.A (ed.).Handbook of Discourse Analysis,Vol.4[C].London:Academic Press,1985.29. 被引量:1
  • 7[4]Fairclough,N.Discourse and Social Change[M].Cambridge:Polity Press,1992.63-67. 被引量:1
  • 8[5]Lakoff,G.& Johnson,M.Metaphors We Live By[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1980.3. 被引量:1
  • 9[6]Schank,R.Tell Me A Story:Narrative and Intelligence[M].Evanston (IL):Northwestern UP,1998.7-9. 被引量:1
  • 10[7]Werth,P.Text Worlds:Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse[M].New York:Pearson,1999.43. 被引量:1

共引文献90

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部