期刊文献+

论行政决策公众参与度及其影响因素——基于中国经验的分析 被引量:9

On the Degree of Public Participation in Administrative Decision-Making and Its Influential Factors:Based on the Analysis of Chinese Experience
下载PDF
导出
摘要 推进行政决策公众参与,就是推动行政决策向公众参与开放,公众参与行政决策"过程",表现为公众与政府互动,由"政府决策"走向"公众与政府共决"即公共决策,实质是以公众参与权制约政府决策权。基于中国经验,通过构建"开放→嵌入→互动"的过程模型,认为开放的实质是"赋权",嵌入的实质是"充权","赋权"越充分且"充权"越充分,行政决策过程中公众与政府互动程度即公众参与度越强。行政决策公众参与度由广度、深度和力度构成,影响行政决策公众参与度的因素,一是参与权利不对称,二是参与权力不对称。 To promote the public participation in administrative decision-making is to make administrative decision-making open to the public and thus the public to participate in the process of administrative decision-making. That means the interaction between the public and the government from "the decision-making by the government " towards "the decisionmaking by both the public and the government" .The essence is that the government's power of decision-making is restrained by the public's power to participate in the administrative decision-making. Based on Chinese experience, this article puts forwards a process model of "opening→embedment→ interaction", and argues that the more the public is entitled and empowered, the stronger the degree of the interaction between the public and the government in the process of administrative decision-making. The degree of public participation in administrative decision-making , which consists of the breadth, depth and intensity, are influenced by the asymmetry of the right and the power for the public to participate in the administrative decision-making.
作者 刘小康 LIU Xiao-kang
出处 《北京行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第4期54-62,共9页 Journal of Beijing administration institute
基金 国家社会科学基金重大招标项目(09&ZD064)
关键词 行政决策 公众参与度 赋权 充权 administrativedecision-making degreeofpublicparticipation entitlement empowerment
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献26

  • 1达尔.民主理论的前言[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1999. 被引量:6
  • 2DAHL. Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy: Autonomy vs. Control [ M ]. New Haven : Yale University Press , 1982:1. 被引量:1
  • 3三大因素决定国际体系发展方向[N].参考消息,2009-06-22. 被引量:1
  • 4于建嵘.土地问题已成为农民维权抗争的焦点[N].光明观察,2005-01-09. 被引量:1
  • 5中国社会科学院.2008年中国互联网舆情分析报告[N].人民日报,2008-12-22. 被引量:2
  • 6《七个问题:等待网络珍珠港事件》,载《参考消息》2008年4月7日第5版. 被引量:1
  • 7美、欧、日三方委员会的调查报告《民主的危机》,台湾中译本,106页. 被引量:1
  • 8肖新煌.《对"宽裕"、"多元"和"社会力"的沉思》,后收入肖新煌等《社会转型》一书,敦理出版社1986年版. 被引量:1
  • 9美国《基督教科学箴言报》2007年1月29日的报道《南非志愿者在居民区巡逻》. 被引量:1
  • 10王绍光.祛魅与超越[M].北京:中信出版社,2010. 被引量:14

共引文献86

同被引文献131

引证文献9

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部