期刊文献+

基于学科核心素养的学生学业评价探析 被引量:9

On Students' Academic Assessment Based on the Key Attainment of Disciplines
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学科核心素养是学生在各学科课程学习过程中形成的适应终身发展和社会发展需要的必备品格和关键能力,是我国学生发展核心素养在各学科课程中的具体体现。在教学中落实学科核心素养的培养任务,要求考试和评价的改革也随之跟进。目前,全球范围内学生学业评价正面临社会发展对公民素养的要求是高标准的,但对人才素养所使用的考试系统并不是高标准的困境。基于学科核心素养的学生学业评价应关注以下几个方面:由基于教材到基于素养,评价内容涵盖核心素养的诸多方面;交互使用多种评价方法,使评价过程更为科学合理;适时制定和调整评价标准,使评价结果更加有效;评价的目的始终追求核心素养的价值取向,即培养全面发展的人。 Key attainment of disciplines is shaped during the students' studying process of various disciplines, and it is the necessary quality and core ability for students to meet the needs of lifelong development and social im- provement, and it is also the concrete embodiment of students' cuhivation of key attainment in various courses. To complete the task of cultivating key attainment in teaching, we should improve the exam and evaluation system at the same time. At present, students' achievement evaluation around the world is faced with the difficulty where the social development has a high demand for civic literacy, but the standard of exam and evaluation system used to evaluate tainment in terms of evaluation; using diversified evaluation methods to make the evaluation process more reasonable; making and adjusting the evaluation standard over time to make the outcome more effective; and always pursuing the value orientation of key attainment, i.e. cultivating well-developed people.
作者 李霞 LI Xia(School of Education, Shaanxi Normal Universit)
出处 《教育理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第19期61-64,共4页 Theory and Practice of Education
关键词 学科核心素养 学生学业评价 基于教材到基于素养 多样方法 评价过程 评价标准 评价目的 key attainment of disciplines students' achievement evaluation from textbook-based to attain-ment-based various methods evaluation process evaluation standard evaluation objective
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献61

  • 1周红.美国国家教育进展评估(NAEP)体系的产生与发展[J].外国教育研究,2005,32(2):77-80. 被引量:17
  • 2崔允漷,夏雪梅.试论基于课程标准的学生学业成就评价[J].课程.教材.教法,2007,27(1):13-18. 被引量:90
  • 3Gipps, C. Assessment for learning [C] // Little, A., & A. Wolf (eds.). Assessment in Transition: learning, monitoring and selection in international perspective. Pergamon Press,1996: 254. 被引量:1
  • 4Olmedilla, Juan M. Tradition and change in national examination systems: A comparison of Mediterranean and Anglo- Saxon countries[C]//Ecksteino, M.A., & Noah, H. J. Exami-nations: Comparative and International Studies. Pergamon Press, 1992: 142. 被引量:1
  • 5Berlak, H. The need for a new science of assessment[C]// Berlak, H.,et al. Toward a New Science of Educational Testing and Assessment. State University of New York Press, 1992:12. 被引量:1
  • 6Stiggins, R. New Assessment Beliefs for New School Mission[J], Phi Dalta Kappan, 2004(9): 22-27. 被引量:1
  • 7Stiggins, R. New Assessment Beliefs for New School Mission [J]. Phi Dalta Kappan, 2004(9): 22-27. 被引量:1
  • 8Atkin, J.M., Black, P., & room assessment and the Coffey, J. E. ( Eds ) ( 2001 ). Class- National Science Education Standards[M]. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press. Chappuis, J. Helping Studengt Understand Assessment[J] Educational Leadership, 2005, 63 ( 3 ) : 39-43. 被引量:1
  • 9Stiggins, R. From Formative Assessment to Assessment for Learning: A Path to Success in Standards-based School[J]. Phi Delta Kappan, 2005( 10): 324-328. 被引量:1
  • 10Jacqueline Grennon Brooks,Martin G.Brooks著,范玮译.建构主义课堂教学案例[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2005.104-105. 被引量:10

共引文献422

同被引文献60

引证文献9

二级引证文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部