期刊文献+

对比两种不同方法治疗股骨胫骨折的临床疗效 被引量:1

To Compare the Clinical Effects of Two Different Methods for the Treatment of Femoral and Tibial Fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析比较股骨颈骨折经全髋关节置换与骨折内固定术治疗的效果。方法随机选择2015年9月—2016年9月在本院接受治疗的股骨颈骨折患者76例参与研究,随机平均分成2组,置换组利用全髋关节置换治疗,内固定组选择骨折内固定术治疗,比较两组效果。结果全髋关节置换的髋关节功能优于骨折内固定术,术后卧床时间为(18.30±2.05)d,优于内固定组(48.37±5.62)d。结论股骨颈骨折应用全髋关节置换治疗的远期效果要明显优于骨折内固定术,能够缩短术后卧床时间。 Objective To analyze and compare the effects of total hip replacement and internal fixation on fracture of neck of femur. Methods 76 patients with femoral neck fracture treated in our hospital from September 2015 to September 2016 were randomly selected to participate in the study, randomly divided into 2 groups, the replacement group was treated with total hip replacement, the internal fixation group was treated with fracture fixation, the two groups were compared. Results The hip joint function of total hip replacement was better than that of fracture fixation, and the postoperative bed rest time was (18.30±2.05) d, the internal fixation group was (48.37±5.62) d. Conclusion The long-term effect of total hip replacement for femoral neck fracture is better than that of internal fixation, and it can shorten the time of bed rest.
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2017年第10期125-127,共3页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 股骨颈骨折 全髋关节置换 骨折内固定术 Femoral neck fracture total hip replacement fracture fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献46

  • 1Tabsh l,Waddell .IP,Morton J. Total hip arthroplasty for complica- tions of proximal femoral fractures [J]. J Orthop Trauma,1997,11: 166-169. 被引量:1
  • 2Frankel U. Prognostic accuracy of preperative and postoperative sointinetry after femoral neck fracture [J]. Clin Orthop, 1990,250(2): 221-224. 被引量:1
  • 3胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学[M].第2版.北京:人民军医出版社,2001:985. 被引量:17
  • 4邓仁椿,朱俊玲,洪澜,等.全髋关节置换和人工股骨头置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中国医师进修杂志,2009;32(z1):81-2. 被引量:2
  • 5Rogmark C,Johnell O, Primary arthroplasty is better than internal fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures:a me- ta-analysis of 14 randomized studies with 2,289 patients [J]. Acta Orthop,2006,77(3) :359-367. 被引量:1
  • 6Sipila J, Hyv0nen P,Partanen J, et al. Early revision after hemiarthroplasty and osteosynthesis of cervical hip frac- ture:short term function mortality unchanged in 102 pa- tients[J]. Acta Orthop Seand,2094,75(4) :402 407. 被引量:1
  • 7Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Tornetta P 3rd, et al. Opera- rive management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. An international survey[J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 2005,87 (9) :2122-2130. 被引量:1
  • 8Wazir NN, Mukundala VV, Choon DS. Early results of prosthetic hip replacement for femoral neck fracture in ac- tive elderly patients[J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2006,14(1):43-46. 被引量:1
  • 9Sehleieher I,Haas H,Adams TS,et al. Minimal-invasive posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty versus standardlateral approach [J]. Acta Orthop Belg, 2011,77(4) :480-487. 被引量:1
  • 10Harris W H.Traumaric arthritis ofthe hipafter dislocation and acetabular fracture: treatment by mold arthroplastyan.An end- result study using a new method of result evaluation [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1969,51:737-755. 被引量:1

共引文献131

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部