摘要
在不动产、动产法律行为所引起的物权变动中,《合同法》第51条与《合同法》、《物权法》所构成的内部体系与外部体系不相融。特殊物权变动情形下,无权处分效力待定能够保护原权利人的利益,与我国相关政策相适应,但在实践中并无适用余地,法释〔2012〕7号第3条对此予以确认。善意取得作为区分规则下物权变动的模式,应遵循债权形式主义立法体例的要求。受让人的善意,仅能补正处分权的瑕疵,并不能补正合同的效力。合同的无效,第三人的善意取得失去了存在的基础。《合同法》第51条规定的并不是德国法意义上的处分行为,而是仅适用于合同法中的处分行为。该规定可以类推适用无权代理规则,使得原权利人能够享受无权处分行为所带来的利益,因此《合同法》第51条不具有存在必要。
In the changing of property rights, which caused by the law behavior of real property and personal property, article 51 of Contract Law is incompatible with the internal system and external system ofContract LawandProperty Law.In of special property changes, unauthorized disposal with pending validity can protect the interests of the holder of the original, and adapt t＇o our coun- try related policy, while in practice and Jurisprudence there are no applicable cases, that＇ s why the article 3 of Interpretation no. 7[ 20121 had confirmed it. Bona fide acquisition, as the mode of property changes charged by distinguishing rules, should con- form to the request of the Creditor＇s Rights Externalism. The goodwill of assignee can only compensate the defect of disposal, not the validity of contract. If the contract is invalid, then the third party lost the foundation of bona fide acquisition. The article 51 of Contract Law does not mean disciplinary actions in the German law＇ s sense, but only means disciplinary actions in contract law. This rule makes the original oblige to enjoy the rights and benefits ,which has contained in the unauthorized disposal, in this way to effectively curb unauthorized disposal, while in this case it can apply rules of unauthorized agency by analogy, thus the article 51 of Contract Lawhas no necessary to exist.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第5期53-63,共11页
Legal Forum
基金
国家重大社科基金项目<民法典编纂重大疑难问题研究>(14ZDC017)
法治湖南建设与区域社会治理协同创新中心资助的阶段性成果
关键词
无权处分
物权变动
法释〔2012〕7号第3条
民法典
unauthorized disposal
property changes
article 3 of Interpretation no. 7[ 2012]
Civil Code.
