摘要
首先介绍了关于话语意义分类的四种观点:激进最简论的最简命题原则、激进语境论的独立性原则、温和最简论的标准化原则与温和语境论的可及性原则;其次,简述国内外相关实证研究;再次,考察这些原则关于解释意义分类和界定所言方面的局限性;最后,基本赞成温和最简论话语意义分为三个独立的层面即明意、隐意和含意的观点,同时兼顾其它观点的基础上试图修正和补充会话隐意理论。
This paper presents four perspectives on utterance meaning classification. They are Minimalist Principle, Independent Principle, Standardized Hypothesis and Availability Hypothesis introduced by classic minimalism, classic contextualism, moderate minimalism and moderate contextualism respectively. Following, it makes a brief review of relevant experimental achievements at home and abroad. It also investigates the deficiencies of them regarding the criteria of meaning classification and saying determination. Finally, this paper provides the basic support for the moderate minimalism suggesting that the utterance meaning can be divided in to three independed layers： explicit, implicit and implicated meaning, thereby it tries to make some modification and improvement to the Impliciture Theory.
出处
《新疆职业大学学报》
2016年第1期34-42,共9页
Journal of Xinjiang Vocational University
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(13CX06003B)
关键词
话语意义
分类原则
实证研究
所言界定
隐意理论
utterance meaning
principle of classification
experimental study
determination of saying
impliciture theory
