期刊文献+

高校场域中规训技术的运用、抗拒及其规制——以学术沙龙为案例 被引量:1

The Application,Resistance and its Regulation of Discipline Technology in the Field of Colleges and Universities——Taking the Academic Salon as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高校作为封闭场域为规训技术的运用提供了空间。规训技术的有效运用得益于行政权力的天然权威,与压迫的、通过暴力和肉体惩罚实现的前现代权力迥异,高校行政权力规训技术的运用是非压迫的、温和持续的、毛细血管状的,具有生产性、网络化、隐匿性的特征。它使用层级监视、规范化裁决和检查等技术手段,从时间和空间双重维度强化对教师身体的控制。以学术沙龙的举办为案例,教师表现出批判、调整或投机3种抗拒形态,致使政策目标难以达成,治理实效性低下。为避免规训技术的滥用,行政部门应当顾及学术组织的松散连接特性,不宜推行整齐划一的政策目标,必须科学地划定权力之间的边界,决策前、决策中和决策后应分别采用参与型、协商型和监督型的共同治理方式,做好共同治理的制度安排。 As the closed fields,the colleges and universities provide the space for the application of the regulation technology. The effective application of the regulation technology is beneficial from the natural authoritative of administrative power,quite different from the oppressive pre- modern power reached by the violence and penalty. The operation of regulation technology for administrative power in colleges and universities is non- oppressive,tender and constant,capillaries form,with the characteristics of productivity,internationalization,hidden form. Through the hierarchical observation,normalizing judgment and examination and etc.,the administrative power takes control of teacher 's body from space- time dimensions. Taking academic salon for example,teachers perform three kinds of resistance types. They either criticize,adjust or perform as a speculator. The policy goal is difficult to be achieved and the governance efficiency is also not high. Therefore,in order to avoid abuse of discipline technology,the administrative departments should care for the loose connection of the scholarship organization. It is improper to make the unified policies and purposes,and a boundary should be drawn between powers,and implement co-governance should be adopted before,while and after the policy decision in the form of participation mode,dialogue and negotiation,and supervision model,in order to do well in the system arrangement of co-governance.
出处 《重庆高教研究》 2016年第3期56-61,共6页 Chongqing Higher Education Research
基金 杭州市哲学社会科学规划课题"高校‘去行政化’的知识社会学分析及其破解机制研究"(M15JC054) 浙江省社会科学界联合会研究课题"高校‘去行政化’的知识社会学分析及其对策建议研究"(2015N008)
关键词 规训技术 规制 抗拒 行政权力 学术权力 discipline technology regulation resistance administrative power academic power
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献12

  • 1谢妮.学校日常生活中的身体[J].教育学报,2006,2(6):91-94. 被引量:8
  • 2王英杰.大学学术权力和行政权力冲突解析——一个文化的视角[J].北京大学教育评论,2007,5(1):55-65. 被引量:146
  • 3[2]吉尔·德勒兹.哲学与权力的谈判[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001.106. 被引量:2
  • 4Michel Foucault. Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison, translated by Alan Sheridan, Vintage Books, New York, 1979. 被引量:1
  • 5韩俊杰.示范校为应试一天学18小时[BB/OL].http://zqb.cyol.com/content/2009-04/OT/content_2611246.htm,2009-04-07. 被引量:1
  • 6田文生.半数中小学生最大愿望是好好睡一觉[EB/OL].http://zqb.cyol.com/content/2009-02/26/content_2556526.htm,2009-02-26. 被引量:1
  • 7李新玲.北京家长自发调查初中生生存状况[EB/OL].http:/zqb.cyol.com/content/200g-04/08/content_2613896.htm.2009-04-08. 被引量:1
  • 8赵敦华.现代西方哲学新编[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2000.. 被引量:13
  • 9金生铉.规训与教化[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004.113. 被引量:67
  • 10米歇尔.福柯,刘北成,杨远婴译.规训与惩罚[M].北京:三联书店,1999.338. 被引量:5

共引文献48

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部