摘要
从司法改革的国际经验和我国发展历程来看,司法改革的方法问题亟需解决。国外司法改革方法既包括技术性路径影响下的科学方法倾向,又涉及整体性路径影响下的系统方法倾向。中国在司法改革的本土化创新道路上形成了"地方探索法""顶层设计法"以及"二元协调法"三种司法改革方法。当前推行的"二元协调法"存在资源调动不足、全面监督缺失、客观评估失衡以及经验提炼欠缺等问题。而这些问题的应对进路在于多元整合论的构建和完善。这种新的司法改革方法需要通过政策过程原理和双重解释原理来达成,以实现司法改革资源的优化整合。
According to the international experience of judicial reform and the development in china, it is urgent to decide on the methods of judicial reform. At present foreign judicial reform methods include both the scientific method under technical route and the system method in the trend of the whole system. And China has formed three judicial reform methods, including ＂local exploration method＂, ＂top level design method＂ and their ＂coordination method＂, which are formed on the innovation path of the judicial reform in China. However, there are some problems in the coordination method such as lack of resource mobilization, the lack of comprehensive supervision, loss of balance in objective assessment and lack of good experience. The approach to deal with these problems is to construct and improve the muhi-integration method. This new method of judicial reform needs to be achieved through the theory of policy process and dual interpretation so that we can realize the optimization and integration of judicial reform resources.
出处
《四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第1期48-56,共9页
Journal of Sichuan University：Philosophy and Social Science Edition
关键词
司法改革方法
多元整合法
政策过程原理
双重解释原理
methodology of judicial reform, the integration method, the policy process theory, dual interpreted theory
