摘要
目的 修订Ployhart和Bliese编制的适应力量表（Individual Adaptability Measure,I-ADAPT-M）并分析其在大学新生应用的信度和效度.方法 修订I-ADAPT-M量表,对1 700名大学新生进行施测,并在1个月后随机抽取其中277名学生施测生活满意度问卷,运用SPSS 18.0以及Amos 4.0进行信效度分析.结果 探索性因素分析表明适应力量表中文版包括23个项目,4个维度（危机创新、人际适应、压力耐受、持续学习）,4个维度可以解释总方差的45.344％,内部一致性信度为0.82.验证性因素分析进一步验证了四维的量表结构（χ^2=708.80,χ^2/df=3.16,CFI=0.95,NNFI=0.94,RMSEA=0.051,SRMR=0.053）.男生在危机创新、持续学习2个维度得分显著高于女生,女生在人际适应维度得分显著高于男生.高中担任过干部的学生在4个维度得分均显著高于普通学生,差异具有统计学意义（t=5.10 --5.02,P＜0.05）,表明该量表具有良好的区分效度.被试的生活满意度与危机创新、人际适应、压力耐受3个维度呈显著的正相关（r=0.21-0.26,P＜0.01）,与持续学习维度相关不显著.结论 适应力量表中文版对于测量大学新生的适应力具有较好的信度和效度.
Objective To revise the individual adaptability measure （I-ADAPT-M） developed by Ployhart ＆amp; Bliese,and analyze the reliability and validity of its application in college freshmen.Methods Revise the I-ADAPT-M,One thousand and seven hundred freshmen were asked to complete the test,one month later,two hundred and seventy-seven freshmen were simple randomly chosen to report their General Life Satisfaction.Then,the data were analysis by SPSS 18.0 and Amos 4.0.Results The exploratory factor analysis showed that,the Chineseversion of the I-ADAPT-M consisted of 23 projects and 4 dimensions （crisis and creativity adaptability,interpersonal adaptability,stress tolerance adaptability,and resistant learning adaptability）,which could account for over 45.344% of total variance.The Cronbacha coefficient of the Chinese-version of the I-ADAPT-M was 0.82.The confirmatory factor analyzed further revealed the structure of four-dimensional scale（χ^2=708.80,χ^2/df =3.16,CFI =0.95,NNFI =0.94,RMSEA =0.051,SRMR =0.053）.Male had significant high core in crisis and creativity adaptability and resistant learning adaptability than female.Female had significant high core in interpersonal adaptability than male.Colleges-leader had significant high core in 4 dimensions than general students,it suggested that the Chinese-version of the I-ADAPT-M had good discriminant validity.General Life Satisfaction of the subjects had significant positive correlation with crisis and creativity adaptability,stress tolerance adaptability and interpersonal adaptability,had little correlation with resistant learning adaptability.Conclusion The Chinese-version of the I-A-DAPT-M has good reliability and validity to measure the individual adaptability of the freshman.
出处
《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2015年第2期181-184,共4页
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
关键词
大学新生
适应力
信度
效度
Undergraduate
Adaptability
Reliability
Validity
