摘要
我国现行公司法创造性的增设了公司僵局司法解散条款之规定,为化解公司僵局开设了司法救济之通道。然而,司法强制解散化解僵局这一单一化路径选择模式难以应对实践中复杂的僵局案件并作出有效回应。鉴于公司自治存在不可避免的负外部性,司法介入化解公司僵局其正当性不言而喻,但必须明确界定其介入之外延。毋庸讳言,公司僵局司法救济机制之完善应在注重章程预防、完善立法及拓宽司法救济路径之基础上对症下药,优先选择强制股权转让、强制公司分立、寻找企业新接管人等替代性措施,司法强制解散应为不得已而为之的最后选择路径。
China＇ s current company law creatively added provisions of judicial dissolution of companydeadlock, judicial relief opened channels to resolve the company deadlock. However, the judicial man-datory dissolution to resolve the impasse that a single path selection mode can not cope with the deadlockin case of complex practice and respond effectively. Due to the company autonomy has inevitable negativeexternalities, the legitimacy of judicial intervention to resolve the company deadlock is self- evident, butthe intervention of the epitaxy must be defined clearly. Needless to say, the company deadlock reliefmechanism improvement should pay attention to the prevention in articles of association, to perfect legis-lation and to broaden the judicial relief path on the basis of an antidote against the disease, the preferredchoice of compulsory share transfer, mandatory separation of the company, enterprises new receiver andother alternative measures should be put into priority and judicial dissolution system should be the last re-sort to choose.
出处
《兰州商学院学报》
2015年第1期116-126,共11页
Journal of Lanzhou Commercial College
关键词
公司僵局
司法介入
司法适用
强制解散
救济机制
company deadlock
judicial intervention
judicial application
mandatory dissolution
reliefmechanism
