摘要
外商投资企业的解散存在两种情况,一是因股东违约而解除合同,二是因公司僵局的存在。前者存在"判决解除合同—审批机关批准解散"的两步法,造成了法院和审批机关在其职责前后承接时认知上的冲突。内外资一致原则要求上海自贸区内的外商投资企业的解散,应当与内资企业保持一致,以确保两类企业的法律地位平等。在此基础上,应当借鉴国外的经验,扩大司法解散的适用情形。法院在审理类似案件时应当运用理论阐述股东与股东之间、股东与公司之间的关系,以正确认识合同解除与司法解散之间的关联。《外商投资法》施行后,公司制外商投资企业的组织形式将与《公司法》对接,传统的两步法将不复存在。
There are two circumstances for foreign-invested enterprises to be dissolved,the termination of contracts by shareholders’breach and the existence of deadlocks.As to the former,so-called two-steps,"termination of contracts by judgement-approval of the dissolution by authority",make a conflict between the court and the authority when they perform their duties one after another.Consistency principle requires the dissolution of foreign-invested enterprises in SFTZ to follow the same procedures as the domestic enterprises,enabling those two kinds of enterprises to have the equal legal statues.Bases on this,the experiences abroad shall be implanted,expanding the application of the judicial dissolution.In hearing such cases,the courts shall use theories to elaborate the relationships between the shareholders and the shareholders/companies,so that they may correctly understand the relevance of the termination of contact and the judicial dissolution.After the"Foreign Investment Law"puts into force,the form of the incorporated foreign-invested enterprises will apply to the"Companies Law",and the traditional two-steps will be no longer in existence.
出处
《经贸法律评论》
2019年第6期74-86,共13页
Business and Economic Law Review
关键词
内外资一致原则
外商投资企业
司法解散
两步法
合同解除
Consistency Principle
Foreign-Invested Enterprises
Judicial Dissolution
Two Steps
Termination of Contract
