期刊文献+

保护性专利审查机制与中外企业的专利战略选择——基于专利授权和条件寿命期的视角 被引量:7

Protective patent examination mechanism and options of patent strategy between Chinese and foreign firms: Based on the perspective of patent grant and provisional life
原文传递
导出
摘要 由于技术创新能力与发达国家有较大差距,我国实行了保护性的专利审查机制,使国内企业能够更容易并更快速地获取专利权。国外企业在中国要想获取专利权往往需要等待更长时间,且获取专利权的难度大于国内企业。我们从专利授权和条件寿命期视角,结合企业的专利战略考虑对这种保护性审查机制的有效性进行了探讨。从申请专利保护的技术垄断效果看,保护性审查机制限制了国外企业专利竞争战略的实施。然而,相较于国内企业,国外企业出于专利市场收益的不确定性考虑,更倾向于延长专利的条件寿命期,保护性审查机制延迟授予国外企业专利权的做法无疑更有益于其专利市场战略的展开。另一方面,由于国内企业获取专利权相对容易,使得一些技术含量低、市场收益水平不高的专利被授权,增加了企业的专利权维持费用。因此,从专利战略视角看,保护性专利审查机制并不完全有利于国内企业。 Since there is a large innovation capability gap between China and developed countries, China implements protective patent examination mechanism, which facilitates domestic firms to get patent right easier and sooner. Foreign firms need to wait longer to get patent right, and it is more difficult for foreign firms to get patent right. We examine the effect of patent examination mechanism from perspective of patent grant and provisional life. By analyzing the technology monopoly effect of patent protection, we find that protective patent examination mechanism prevents foreign firms from implementing patent competition strategy. How- ever, compared with domestic firms, foreign firms pay more attention to the market income mobilization of patent, hence they tend to extend patents' provisional life. Since protective patent examination mechanism further extends patent provisional life of foreign firms, it is more beneficial for foreign firms to implement patent market strategy. On the other hand, since it is easier for domestic firms to get patent right, large number of patents with low level of technology and low market income are granted, which increases firms' patent renewal fee. Therefore, from the perspective of patent strategy, protective patent examination mechanism is not fully beneficial to domestic firms.
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期9-18,共10页 Science Research Management
基金 教育部人文社科基金青年基金(13YJC630219) 北京市自然科学基金青年基金(9144036) 青岛市软科学项目(基金号:12-1-3-84-(6)-zhc)资助
关键词 专利 审查机制 专利战略 条件寿命期 专利授权 patent examination mechanism patent strategy provisional life patent grant
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Christensen C M,Overdorf M.Meeting the challenge of disruptive change[J].Harvard Business Review,2000,78(2):66-76. 被引量:1
  • 2Shen J.The successful beginning of publication of Chinese patent documents[J].World Patent Information.1986,8(1):8-19. 被引量:1
  • 3张义明.印度在国际科技合作中的知识产权保护[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2002,17(12):12-13. 被引量:2
  • 4Shanghai Patent Agency.Procedures in the Chinese patent officeNotes on what to do after an application for a patent for invention has passed the preliminary examination stage at the Chinese patent office[J]..World Patent Information.1989,11(2):93-94. 被引量:1
  • 5Nakata Y,Zhang X.A survival analysis of patent examination request in Japanese electrical and electronic manufacturers.Working Paper,Doshisha University,Okayama University,2009. 被引量:1
  • 6张古鹏,陈向东.基于专利的中外新兴产业创新质量差异研究[J].科学学研究,2011,29(12):1813-1820. 被引量:40
  • 7Day G S,Schoemaker P J H.Scanning the periphery[J].Harvard Business Review,2005,78(2):66-76. 被引量:1
  • 8Zeebroeck N.Patents only live twice:a patent survival analysis in Europe.CEB Working Paper,October 2007. 被引量:1
  • 9Kiige C J.The ARIPO patent search,examination and documentation procedures[J].World Patent Information.1992,14(1):5-7. 被引量:1
  • 10Harhoff D,Wagner S.Modeling the duration of patent examination at the European patent office[R].CEPR Discussion Paper 5283,Centre for Economic Policy Research,London,2005. 被引量:1

二级参考文献39

  • 1闵京基,潜伟.韩国中小企业技术创新现状与扶持政策[J].科学学研究,2004,22(6):600-605. 被引量:11
  • 2国务院.关于加快培育和发展战略性新兴产业的决定[R].国发32号,2010. 被引量:1
  • 3Erickcek G A, Watts B R. Emerging industires- looking beyond the usual suspects [ R ]. A Report to WIRED, 2007. 被引量:1
  • 4Evangelista R, Iammarino S, Mastrostefano V, Silvani A. Measuring the regional dimension of innovation: lessons from the Italian innovation survey [ J]. Technovation, 2001, 21(11): 733-745. 被引量:1
  • 5Acs Z J, Anselin L, Varga A. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge [ J ]. Research Policy, 2002, 31( 7 ) : 1069 - 1085. 被引量:1
  • 6Hagedoorn J, Cloodt M. Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? [ J]. Research policy, 2003, 32(8) : 1365 - 1379. 被引量:1
  • 7Yueh L. Patent laws and innovation in China[ J]. International Review of Law and Economics, 2009, 29:304 -313. 被引量:1
  • 8Burke P F, Markus Reitzig. Measuring patent assessment quality--analyzing the degree and kind of (in) consistency in patent offices' decision making[ J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36 : 1404 - 1430. 被引量:1
  • 9Reitzig M. On the effectiveness of novelty and inventive step as patentability requirements--structural empirical evidence using patent indicators [ R ]. SSRN WP 745568, 2005. 被引量:1
  • 10Dominique tions, grant ters, 2000, Guelle9 Bruno van Pottelsberghe. Applieas and the value of patent[J]. Economic Letters 69(1) : 109 -114. 被引量:1

共引文献46

同被引文献78

引证文献7

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部