期刊文献+

儿童期虐待、人格、不安全感对医学生分离特质影响的路径分析 被引量:3

The effects of childhood abuse,personality,insecurity on dissociative trait of medical students:a path anal-ysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:构建医学生儿童期虐待、人格、不安全感与分离特质的关系模型。方法采用整群抽样法抽取某医学院262名医学生,使用解离特质量表(DTS)、儿童期虐待史自评量表( PRCA)、不安全感心理自评量表(SRFIS)、简式大五人格问卷(NEO-FFI-R)等工具进行测评,用Amos7.0作路径分析。结果①儿童期虐待与不安全感、分离特质、神经质呈正相关(r=0.248~0.361, P<0.01),与外向性、友善性、谨慎性呈负相关(r=-0.168~-0.250, P<0.01);不安全感与分离特质、神经质呈正相关(r=0.479~0.522, P<0.01),与外向性、友善性、谨慎性呈负相关(r=-0.234~-0.324,P<0.01);分离特质与神经质呈正相关(r=0.597, P<0.01),与外向性、开放性、友善性、谨慎性呈负相关(r=-0.133~-0.453, P<0.05)。②路径分析结果显示,儿童期虐待对不安全感有直接正向影响(B=0.339, P<0.01),对大五人格有直接负向影响(B=-0.226, P<0.01),对分离特质无直接影响(B=-0.014,P>0.05);大五人格对不安全感、分离特质有直接负向影响( B=-0.609~-0.363, P<0.01);不安全感对分离特质有直接正向影响( B=0.448,P<0.01);大五人格和不安全感作为中介变量调节儿童期虐待对分离特质的影响。模型的拟合指数为χ^2/df=1.151<3.000, P=0.080>0.05,RMSEA=0.024<0.050,GFI=0.935,AGFI=0.909,NFI=0.923,RFI=0.902,IFI=0.989,TLI=0.986,CFI=0.989,模型拟合良好。结论大五人格和不安全感作为中介变量调节着儿童期虐待对医学生分离特质的影响作用,儿童期虐待对分离特质无直接影响。 Objective To build the relationship model of childhood aubuse, personality, insecurity and dissociative trait in medical students. Methods Through stratified sampling,262 medical students were investiga-ted by the Personal Report of Childhood Abuse( PRCA) ,Dissociative Trait Scale( DTS) ,Self-Rating Feeling of In-security Scale( SRFIS) ,Revised NEO Five-Factor Inventory( NEO-FFI-R) . A path analysis was applied by AMOS (Analysis of Moment Structures) version 7.0. Results ①Childhood abuse was positively related to insecurity, dissociative trait and neuroticism( r=0.248~0.361, P〈0.01) ,but was passively related to extraversion,agreeable-ness and conscientiousness( r=-0.168^-0.250, P〈0.01). Insecurity was positively related to dissociative trait and neuroticism( r=0.479~0.522, P〈0.01) ,but was passively related to extraversion,agreeableness and conscien-tiousness( r=-0.234^-0.324, P〈0.01). Dissociative trait was positively related to neuroticism( r=0.597, P〈0.01) ,but was passively related to openness, extraversion, agreeableness and conscientiousness ( r=-0. 133^-0.453, P〈0.05). ②The path analysis showed that childhood abuse was directly related to insecurity(B=0.339, P〈0.01)and personality(B=-0.226, P〈0.01)of medical students. Personality was directly related to insecurity and dissociative( B=-0.609^-0.363, P〈0.01) . Insecurity was directly related to dissociative trait( B=0.448, P〈0.01) . Personality and insecurity mediated entirely the relationship between childhood abuse and dissociative trait of medical students. The model fit indexes were χ^2/ df =1.151〈3.000, P=O.080〉0.05,RMSEA=0.024〈0.050, GFI=0.935,AGFI=0.909,NFI=0.923,RFI=0.902,IFI=0.989,TLI=0.986 and CFI=0.989. Conclusion Per-sonality and insecurity as mediated variable mediate the relationship between childhood abuse and dissociative trait of medical students. Childhood abuse has no direct effect on dissociative trait of medical students.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第11期1017-1019,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 江苏省卫生厅医学科研课题面上项目(H200876)
关键词 儿童期虐待 人格 不安全感 分离特质 路径分析 Childhood abuse Personality Insecurity Dissociative trait Path analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献55

共引文献49

同被引文献31

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部