期刊文献+

解离特质量表编制及信效度分析 被引量:3

Development, reliability and validity of the dissociative trait scale
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的编制解离特质量表并检验其信效度。方法根据文献和心理测量学原理编制解离特质量表,对1306名大学生进行测试,并测试症状自评量表(SCL-90)作为效标。结果①探索性因子分析得到8个因子,分别为出神、现实解体、躯体化、人格解体、自我调节、情感麻木、疏忽遗忘、时空混乱,可解释总方差的57.69%。②总量表和8个因子分量表的Cronbach’α系数分别为0.969,0.889,0.907,0.874,0.890,0.892,0.872,0.855,0.830,重测信度分别为0.763,0.585,0.677,0.613,0.651,0.684,0.621,0.575,0.638(P〈0.01)。③解离特质量表总分和各因子分数分别与SCL-90总分和各因子分数呈正相关(r=0.200~0.714,P〈0.01)。结论解离特质量表在大学生中具有良好的信效度,可作为评估解离特质水平的测量工具。 Objective To develop the Dissociative Trait Scale(DTS) ,and examine its reliability and validity. Methods Based on literature and research work,a preliminary questionnaire was designed to measure dissociative trait. 1306 college students completed the DTS and Symptom Checklist 90(SCL-90). Results Explorarmy factor analysis extracted eight factors. The percentage of variance explained was 57.69%. The Cronbach α- coefficient of the total scale and the eight subscales ranged from 0. 830 - 0. 969,/he test-retest reliability ranged from 0. 575 - 763 (P〈 0.01 ). The seores of DTS significantly positively correlated with the scores of SCL-90 (P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion The DTS has acceptable psychometric quality,and can be applied to assess dissociative traits in Chinese college students.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第1期79-81,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 首都医学发展科研基金(2003-3070)
关键词 解离特质量表 信度 效度 Dissociative trait scale Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Bernstein EM,Putnam FW.Development,reliability,and validity of a dissociation scale.J Nerv Ment Dis,1986,174:727-735. 被引量:1
  • 2Akyüz G,Dogan O,Sar V,et al.Frequency of dissociative identity disorder in the general population in Turkey.Compr Psychiatry,1999,40:151-159. 被引量:1
  • 3Ross CA,Duffy CM,Ellason JW,et al.Prevalence,reliability and validity of dissociative disorders in an inpatient setting.J Trauma Dissociation,2002,3:7-17. 被引量:1
  • 4Sar V,Tutkun H,Alyanak B,et al.Frequency of dissociative disorders among psychiatric outpatients in Turkey.Compr Psychiatry,2000,41:216-222. 被引量:1
  • 5陈强,李红政,肖玮,王家同,苗丹民.中国士兵人格问卷-Ⅱ的信度研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2007,16(3):276-278. 被引量:7
  • 6Kraemer HC,Gullion CM.Rush AJ,et al.Can state and trait variables be disentangled? A methodological framework for psychiatric disorders.Psychiatry Res,1994,52:55-69. 被引量:1
  • 7Loranger AW,Lenzenweger ME,Gartner AF,et al.Trait-state artifacts and the diagnosis of personality disorders.Arch Gen Psychiatry,1991,48:720-728. 被引量:1
  • 8Lipsanen T,Saarij(a)rvi S,Lauerma H.The Finnish version of the Dissociative Experiences Scale-Ⅱ (DES-Ⅱ) and psychiatric distress.Nord J Psychiatry,2003,57:17-22. 被引量:1
  • 9Krüger C,Mace CJ.Psychometric validation of the State Scale of Dissociation (SSD).Psychol Psychother,2002,75:33-51. 被引量:1
  • 10Murray J,Ehlers A,Mayou RA.Dissociation and posttraumatic stress disorder:Two prospective studies of road traffic accident victims.Br J Psychiatry,2002,180:363-368. 被引量:1

二级参考文献5

共引文献6

同被引文献32

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部