期刊文献+

中国英语学习者汉语恭维应答语语用“外借迁移”现象研究 被引量:3

An OT Analysis of Pragmatic “Borrowing Transfer” in Chinese EFL Learner's Compliment Response Behavior
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过情景选择及补全对话测试考察了中国英语学习者(英专组和非英专组)汉语恭维语应答的情况。与一组从未接受过英语教育的受试(零英语组)进行对比,结果表明,英专组应答时遵守赞同准则而产生了语用"外借迁移"现象,而非英专业组与零英语组应答方式均遵守谦虚准则。优选论分析表明,产生"外借迁移"现象是由于英专组在应答时将赞同准则列为高级别制约条件;而非英专组在作答时仍以谦虚准则为高级别制约条件。 A multiple choice test and a dialogue completion test were carried out to examine Chinese EFL learners' compliment response behavior. Compared with a group of non-English speakers, English majors follow the Agreement Maxim and thus "borrowing transfer" is resulted, while the non-English-major group tends to follow the Modest Maxim, which is similar to way of the response of the non- English-speaker group. Through an OT analysis, it is argued that the English major group tends to take the Agreement Maxim as the higher ranking constraint in response to the compliment, whereas the non-English-major group and the non-English-speaker group take the Modest Maxim as the higher ranking constraint.
作者 侯建东
出处 《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》 CAS 2014年第6期95-99,共5页 Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
关键词 恭维应答语 外借迁移 礼貌原则 优选论 compliment response borrowing transfer politeness principle optimality theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献51

  • 1Archangeli, D. 1997. Optimality theory: An introduction to linguistics in the 1990 [A]. In Archangeli & Langendoen (eds.). Optimality Theory: An Overview [C]. Oxford: Blackwell. 被引量:1
  • 2Browrnan, C. & L. Goldstein. 1990. Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech [A]. In J. Kingston & M. Beckman (eds.). Papers in Laboratory Phonology I : Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech [ C ].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 被引量:1
  • 3Chornsky, N. & M. Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English [M]. New York: Harper & Row. 被引量:1
  • 4Diver, W. 1979. Phonology as human behavior [A]. In D. Aatonson & P. Reiber (eds.). Psycholinguistic Research: Implications and Applications [ C]. Hillside NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 被引量:1
  • 5Hale, M. 2000. Marshallese phonology, the phoneticsphonology interface and historical linguistics [A]. In N. Ritter (ed.). 2000. 被引量:1
  • 6Kean, M. L. 1975. The Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar [D]. MIT Ph. D. dissertation. 被引量:1
  • 7Kirchner, R. 1997. Contrastiveness and faithfulness [J].Phonology 14/1. 被引量:1
  • 8Lindblorn, B. 1963. Spectrographic study of vowel reduction [ J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 35: 1773-81. 被引量:1
  • 9--1990. Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H&H Theory [ A]. In W. Hardcastle & A. Marchal ( eds.). Speech Production and Speech Modelling [C]. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 被引量:1
  • 10McCarthy, J. to appear. Optimality Theory: A Schematic Guide [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 被引量:1

共引文献40

同被引文献50

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部