期刊文献+

对英美等国家基于证据的教育研究取向之评析 被引量:28

Analyzing the Orientation of Evidence-based Educational Research in Britain and U. S.
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于证据的教育研究的盛行,反映了英美等国家教育实践和政策领域新出现的一种重效果和重技术主义的取向,它同时也折射出传统实证主义取向的科学理论研究和人文主义取向的质性研究,在面对实践时的无力感和极为尴尬的处境。然而,基于证据的教育研究不应也不能超越甚至替代传统研究,它的单一性效果关注很可能为教育实践带来更大的隐患。教育专业研究者在对此报以警惕的同时,更需要内省的是如何结束目前内部话语纷呈的分离格局,并建立最广泛意义上的专业共识。 The prevalence of evidence-based educational research reflects an emerging orientation in western educational practices and policies, which puts great emphasis on effects and technicism. In a way, it also reveals that speaking of application, the traditional positivism-oriented scientific theoretical research and the humanism-oriented qualitative research both have fallen into a plight of helplessness and embarrassment. Nonetheless, the evidence-based educational research should not and cannot surpass or replace traditional research, because its exclusive focus on effects may incur more serious potential dangers in educational practice. What the educational researchers should do is to keep alert to those dangers and think over how to end this separated situation of varied and complicated discourses, and to aim at reaching the professional consensus in the most comprehensive sense.
作者 阎光才
出处 《教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期137-143,共7页 Educational Research
关键词 基于证据的研究 理论建构 技术主义 效果 evidence-based research, theoretical construction, technicism, effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Ray Pawson. Evidence-Based Policy : A Realist Perspective[M]. SAGE Publications Inc,2006. 被引量:1
  • 2Robert Boruch. Preface: Better Evaluation for Evidence-Based Policy : Place Randomized Trials in Education, Criminology,Welfare, and Health [j]. Annals of the American Academy ofPolitical and Social Science, 2005,Vol. 599. 被引量:1
  • 3Robert E. Slavin. What Works. Issues inSynthesizing Educational Program Evaluations [J]. EducationalResearcher, 2008, (1). 被引量:1
  • 4Anthony Petrosino, et al. Meeting the Challenges ofEvidence-Based Policy: The Campbell Collaboration [j]. Annals ofthe American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2001,Vol.578. 被引量:1
  • 5Philip Davies. What Is Evidence-BasedEducation. [j]. British Journal of Educational Studies, 1999, (2). 被引量:1
  • 6Rebecca A. Maynard. Presidential Address: Evidence-based Decision Making: What Will It Take for the Decision Makersto Care.[j]. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2006, (2). 被引量:1
  • 7Sue Clegg. Evidence-Based Practice in EducationalResearch: A Critical Realist Critique of Systematic Review [J].British Journal of Sociology of Education,2005,(3). 被引量:1
  • 8Martyn Hammersley. Can and Should EducationalResearch Be Educative. [J]. Oxford Review of Education, 2003,(1). 被引量:1
  • 9格特.比斯塔,赵康.教育研究和教育实践中的证据和价值[J].北京大学教育评论,2011,9(1):123-135. 被引量:23

二级参考文献34

  • 1Ax, J. & Ponte, P. (2010). Moral issues in educational praxis: A perspective from pedagogiek and didactiek as human sciences in continental Europe. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 18(1), 29-42. 被引量:1
  • 2Bernstein, R.J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadephia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 被引量:1
  • 3Biesta, G. J.J. (2005). What can critical pedagogy learn from postmodernism? Further reflections on the impossible future of critical pedagogy. I. Gur Ze'ev (ed) , Critical theory and critical pedagogy today. Toward a new critical language in education. Haifa : Studies in Education (University of Haifa) ,pp. 143-159. 被引量:1
  • 4Biesta, G. J. J. (2007a). Why "what works" won't work. Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit of educational research. Educational Theory, 57 ( 1 ), 1-22. 被引量:1
  • 5Biesta, G. J.J. (2007b). Bridging the gap between educational research and educational practice: The need for critical distance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13 (3), 295-301. 被引量:1
  • 6Biesta, G. J. J. (2009). Values and ideals in teachers' professional judgement. S. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall & A. Cribb (eds). Changing teacher professionalism (pp. 184-193). London: Routledge. 被引量:1
  • 7Biesta, G. J.J. (2010a). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, Co: Paradigm Publishers. 被引量:1
  • 8Biesta, G. J.J. (20lOb). Five these on complexity reduction and its politics. D.C. Osberg & G. J.J. Biesta (Eds). Complexity theory and the politics of education. Rotterdam : Sense Publishers, pp. 5-14. 被引量:1
  • 9Biesta, G. J. J. ( in press). An alternative future for European educational research. Zeitschrift far Padagogische Historiographie. 被引量:1
  • 10Biesta, G. J.J. & Burbules, N. (2003). Pragmatism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. 被引量:1

共引文献22

同被引文献246

引证文献28

二级引证文献281

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部