摘要
1984年法国蒙特尼与美国盖洛争议艾滋病病毒发现权与病毒测试专利权,1987年美国公共卫生局认定二者共享专利权;1989年美国科学诚信办公室建立并组织调查盖洛事件,1992年最终判定盖洛无科学不端行为;1993年新改组的美国研究诚信办公室重新审查盖洛案件,依据新科学不端行为定义判定盖洛具有不端行为;此后美国卫生与人类服务部上诉委员会受理盖洛上诉后,反对新不端行为定义标准,撤消对盖洛的指控。盖洛案件前后历经10年,经历从艾滋病毒发现权的民事诉讼到科学不端行为的行政诉讼,其间涉及调查机构变动,促成不端行为定义规范,直接导致无听证会调查模式。
In 1984 two researchers from France and America, Montagnier and Gallo, disputed with each other on AIDS discovery priority and AIDS test patent. In 1987 the US Public Health Service declared they both share the patent right. In 1989, however, the newly established Office of Scientific Integrity investigated into Gallo's case. In 1992 OSI declared Gallo free from misconduct. In 1993, the newly organized Office of Research Integrity rechecked Gallo's case again, regarding him as guilty of scientific misconduct according to the new definition of scientific misconduct. Later on, opposing to the new definition, the US Health and Human Service Appeal Committee accepted Gallo's appeal and eventually rescinded the accusation against him. Gallo's case has lasted for ten years, turning from civil lawsuit into administrative litigation, and experienced the change of investigative organizations, finally leading to the standardization of the definition of scientific misconduct and the mode of investigation without hearing.
出处
《自然辩证法通讯》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第1期62-67,126-127,共6页
Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金
2012年度教育部人文社会科学研究专项任务(科研诚信与学风建设)课题2<中国大学处理学术不端的机制和组织机构研究>
