摘要
交通事故认定有无行政可诉性,一直存在争议。随着2004年《道路交通安全法》的出台,交通事故认定书仅作为证据接受审查,由此引发了对交通事故认定不可诉的热议。然而,作为证据被审查与作为具体行政行为被审查,无论在内容、程度还是举证责任上都存在差异。对交通事故认定之行政可诉性的探讨,不能因交通事故认定书具备一定的证明力,就放弃从行为性质与行为特征方面还原交通事故认定在行政可诉性问题上的真实面貌。
Whether or not the affirmation to traffic accident has administrative actionability is always controversial. With the Law of the People Republic of China on Road Traffic Safety coming into effect in 2004, the traffic accident report is reviewed only as an evidence, so that a discussion about non-actionability of the affirmation to traffic accident is in hotly discussed. However, reviewed as an evidence or as a specific administrative act are different in contents, extent and the burden of proof. Discussing on the administrative actionability of traffic accident affirmation can＇t give up restoring its truth on the issue about administrative actionability from its nature and features, just because the traffic accident report has a certain degree of probative force.
出处
《湖南警察学院学报》
2013年第6期101-107,共7页
Journal of Hunan Police Academy
关键词
交通事故认定
行政确认
具体行政行为
行政可诉性
affirmation to traffic accident
administrative affirmation
specific administrative act
administrative actionability
