期刊文献+

新旧心肺复苏指南指导院外心源性猝死抢救效果的对比研究 被引量:10

Intervention effects of old and new editions of cardiopulmonary resuscitation guideline on out-of-hospital sudden cardiac death
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较2005年旧版心肺复苏(CPR)指南和2010年新版CPR指南指导下院外心源性猝死(SCA)的抢救效果。方法纳入2008年7月~2010年9月在旧版CRP指导下进行院外CRP抢救的SCA患者248例作为旧指南组,2011年1月~2013年3月在新版CRP指导下抢救的SCA患者282例作为新指南组,比较两组SCA患者经CPR抢救后的自主循环恢复率、1个月存活率以及1个月后无脑功能受损的存活率。结果与旧指南组比较,新指南组自主循环恢复率明显增加(12.77%vs.7.66%,P=0.045),其中SCA发作至接受CPR的时间≤10 min的患者中,新指南组自主循环恢复率明显高于旧指南组(36.23%vs.19.35%, P=0.032);而超过10 min接受CPR的患者之间自主循环恢复率无差异(5.16%vs.3.76%,P=0.501)。新指南组1个月后存活率以及存活且无脑功能受损的患者比例均高于旧指南组,但差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论新版CPR指南较旧版指南抢救SCA患者成功率更高,同时还可提高患者无脑功能受损的存活率。 Objective To compare the rescue results of out-of-hospital (OOH) sudden cardiac death (SCD) guided by 2005 AHA CPR Guideline and 2010 AHA CPR Guideline. Methods The patients (n=248) with OOH CPR rescue guided by 2005 AHA CPR Guideline were chosen from July, 2008 to Sept. 2010 as 2005 group, and the patients (n=282) with OOH CPR rescue guided by 2010 AHA CPR Guideline were chosen from Jan. 2011 to Mar. 2013as 2010 group. The recovery rate of spontaneous circulation, one-month survival rate and survival rate without cerebral injury after one month were compared between two groups. Results Compared with 2005 group, the recovery rate of spontaneous circulation increased significantly in 2010 group (12.77% vs. 7.66%, P=0.045). Among the patients accepted CPR within 10 minutes after SCD attack, the recovery rate of spontaneous circulation was significantly higher in 2010 group than that in 2005 group (36.23%vs. 19.35%, P=0.032), while among those accepted CPR after 10 minutes, the recovery rate of spontaneous circulation had no difference between two groups (5.16%vs. 3.76%, P=0.501). The proportion of one-month survival rate and survival rate without cerebral injury after one month were all higher in 2010 group than those in 2005 group but the difference was not statistically significant (P〉0.05). Conclusion The success rate of rescuing SCD patients guided by 2010 AHA CPR Guideline is higher, and at the same time the survival rate of the patients without cerebral injury is improved.
出处 《中国循证心血管医学杂志》 2013年第5期476-478,共3页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Cardiovascular Medicine
关键词 心肺复苏 指南 心源性猝死 自主循环 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation Guideline Sudden cardiac death Spontaneous circulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Chugh SS,Jui J,Gunson K,et al. Current burden of sudden cardiac death: multiple source surveillance versus retrospective death certificate-based review in a large US community[J]. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2004, 44(6): 1268-75. 被引量:1
  • 2Leal J,Luengo-Fern 6 ndez R,Gray A,et al. Economic burden of cardiovascular diseases in the enlarged European Union[J]. European Heart Journal,2006,27(13): 1610-9. 被引量:1
  • 3Zheng ZJ,Croft JB,Giles WH,et al. Sudden cardiac death in the United States,1989 to 1998[J]. Circulation,2001,104(18):158-63. 被引量:1
  • 4Rea TD,Eisenberg MS,Becker LJ,et al. Temporal trends in sudden cardiac arrest[J]. Circulation,2003,107(22):2780-5. 被引量:1
  • 5Perkins GD,Brace SJ,Smythe M,et al. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: recent advances in resuscitation and effects on outcome[J]. Heart,2012,98(7):529-35. 被引量:1
  • 6Sasson C,Rogers MAM,Dahl J,et al. Predictors of Survival From Out- of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest[J]. Circulation:Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes,2010,3(1): 63-81. 被引量:1
  • 7Do HQ,Nielsen SL,Rasmussen LS. Response interval is important for survival until admission after prehospital cardiac arrest[J]. Danish medical bulletin,2010,57( 12):A4203. 被引量:1
  • 8Rea T,Blackwood J,Damon S,et al. A link between emergency dispatch and public access AEDs: potential implications for early defibrillation[J]. Resuscitation,2011,82(8):995-8. 被引量:1
  • 9Travers AH,Rea TD,Bobrow BJ,et al. Part 4: CPR Overview[J]. Circulation, 2010, 122(18 suppl 3):S676-S84. 被引量:1
  • 10Jacobs I,Nadkarni V,Bahr J,et al. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update and simplification of the Utstein templates for resuscitation registries: a statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian Resuscitation Council, New Zealand Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Councils of Southern Africa)[J]. Circulation,2004,110(21 ):3385 -97. 被引量:1

共引文献6

同被引文献66

引证文献10

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部