摘要
普遍管辖权是国家刑事管辖权的形式之一。由于各国学者对于普遍管辖权的意义认识不同,导致了普遍管辖权的不同定义,因此,有必要对此作进一步的归纳和研究。通过对国际条约和国内法的规定以及学者观点的分析,按照法律渊源的不同,普遍管辖权可以分为三种类型:基于习惯国际法的普遍管辖权、基于国际条约的普遍管辖权和基于国内法的普遍管辖权。它们各有其定义和特征,并具有不同的适用范围。概括地讲,普遍管辖权是指根据国际法或国内刑法中的代理条款,国家对外国人在本国领土以外并非针对本国国家或国民的犯罪进行管辖的权利。
Universal jurisdiction is one form of the state criminal jurisdiction.The diversity of its definition is due to scholars' disagreement on its significance which is further generalized and discussed in this paper.After analyzing the provisions of international conventions and domestic law and scholars' perspectives,this paper divides universal jurisdiction into three categories according to its legal origins:the one based on common international law,the one on international conventions and the one on domestic law.Each of them has its own definition,characteristics and scope of application.Generally speaking,universal jurisdiction refers to the right of having jurisdiction over the foreigners in foreign territories by a state in accordance with the agency clauses of international law and domestic criminal law.It is not for a crime committed by the nationals in their own countries.
出处
《中国政法大学学报》
2013年第3期25-40,159,共16页
Journal Of CUPL