摘要
从国际法角度对专利无效司法审查问题进行探讨,并通过案例分析、法理分析、国际法与国内法的关系角度分析,研究发现:专利无效司法审查是法院的职权范围,应遵循合法审查的原则,应当从实体和程序两个方面进行审查;在实体方面的审查结果,可以根据案情直接作出专利无效或有效的判决;在程序方面,可根据不同情况作出撤销原审查决定、撤销原审查决定并责令专利复审委重新作出审查决定或维持审查决定的判决或裁定。
From the perspective of international law, this paper makes a probe into the judicial review on patent invalida- tion. Through the case study, legal analysis and the method to analyze the relations between international law and domestic law, the research finds that the judicial review on patent invalidation is the function and power of a court, which should follow the prin- ciple of legal review from both substantial and procedural aspects. The review results from the substantial perspective can directly lead to a judgment whether the patent is valid or not according to the details of case. From procedural perspective, a judgment can be made to cancel the original decision, withdraw the decision and mandate the patent re-examination committee to make a review decision or affirm the original judgment according to different situation.
出处
《北京工商大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第4期98-103,共6页
JOURNAL OF BEIJING TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS UNIVERSITY:SOCIAL SCIENCES
关键词
司法审查
专利无效
行政诉讼
侵权
专利复审
知识产权
judicial review
patent invalidation
administrative litigation
tort
patent re-examination
intellectual propertyright （IPR）
