摘要
我国刑事诉讼法在讯问制度的设计上过于侧重保障公权力查明真相的职权,使得犯罪嫌疑人沦为诉讼客体,刑讯逼供正是二者的权力权利失衡的必然产物。近年来多起因刑讯逼供造成的冤假错案的爆发使当权者正视这一立法顽疾,在今年出台的《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法修正案》(以下简称刑诉修正案)对讯问制度进行了一系列的改革,赞扬批判之声共存。本文将简单介绍我国现行的讯问制度,分析草案对讯问制度的修改内容,就草案引发的争议陈述自己的见解,并借域外讯问制度这块他山之石,提出进一步的改革构想以更好地预防刑讯逼供。
The interrogation system used to be constructed by Chinese Criminal Procedure Law in to grant the authority the power to find out the truth rather than protect the suspect’s proper rights, inevitably resulting in the authority torturing the suspect, which in turn has already caused numerous unjust and unfair cases in recent years. When the Amendment of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Criminal Procedure Law Amendment) was promulgated this year, aiming at reforming such an interrogation system, acclaims and criticisms were both heard. This article gives a brief introduction to Chinese current interrogation system, and analyzes the relevant part in the Amendment. In referring to the practice in other countries in the regard, the article puts forward some proposals to further the reform of the interrogation mechanism.
出处
《广州广播电视大学学报》
2012年第2期74-79,111,共6页
Journal of Guangzhou Open University
关键词
讯问程序
刑讯逼供
刑诉修正案
犯罪嫌疑人陈述
interrogation
torture
Criminal Procedure Law Amendment
suspect’s statement
