期刊文献+

英语专业高年级学生在教学条件下隐喻能力的发展--隐喻生涯假说阐释 被引量:31

Advanced Chinese EFL learners' development of metaphorical competence in instructed conditions:A COM Hypothesis-based account
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究在隐喻生涯假说的框架下考察英语专业高年级学生隐喻能力的发展。80名大学三年级学生被随机分配到四个实验组,接受对24个新异名词隐喻的教学处理。结果显示:1)所有组对类比隐喻的偏好由明喻式转向隐喻式;2)所有组在理解类比隐喻时比理解外表特征隐喻和杂交隐喻时使用更多的范畴化线索;3)尽管整体而言本体产出的创造性偏低,所有组本体产出的创造性均不同程度地增加。本文的结论是:1)多种本体输入、单纯重复输入、相似度判断和相似性辨别四种教学方法对二语学习者隐喻能力的发展均起到了不同程度的促进作用;2)隐喻的类型对二语学习者隐喻能力的发展起决定性作用;3)隐喻生涯假说不失为描述二语学习者隐喻能力发展的理论框架。 This study investigates the development of metaphorical competence in advanced Chinese EFL learners within the framework of the Career of Metaphor(COM) Hypothesis.A cohort of 80 third-year college learners of English were randomly assigned to four instruction groups and received different orienting instructions on 24 novel metaphors.The findings show that:(1) There appeared to be a shift from preference for simile forms to preference for metaphor forms in the case of analogy metaphors for all four participant groups;(2) The participants,regardless of their learning condition,tended to use more categorization cues when interpreting analogy metaphors than when interpreting hybrid and attribute metaphors;and(3) The participants from all groups generally made progress in the originality of the metaphors they produced,although the level of originality was low.It was concluded that:(1) All instructed conditions have a facilitative role to play in L2 learners' development of metaphorical competence;(2) Metaphor type significantly affects L2 learners' development of metaphorical competence;and(3) The COM Hypothesis might serve as an adequate descriptive framework for the investigation into L2 learners' development of metaphorical competence.
作者 苏远连
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期207-219,319-320,共13页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 广东省哲学社会科学“十一五”规划2010年项目“中国高级二语学习者隐喻能力发展”(GD10CWW06)的研究成果之一
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Bowdle, B. 1998. Conventionality, Polysemy, and Metaphor Comprehension [D]. Ph.D. Dissertation. Northwestern University. 被引量:1
  • 2Bowdle, B. &D. Gentner. 2005. The career of metaphor [J]. Psychological Review 112: 193-216. 被引量:1
  • 3Chiappe, D. &J. Kennedy. 2001. Literal bases for metaphor and simile [J]. Metaphor and Symbol 16: 249-276. 被引量:1
  • 4Craik, F. & R. Lockhart. 1972. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research [J]. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11 : 671-683. 被引量:1
  • 5Danesi, M. 1992. Metaphorical competence in second language acquisition and second language teaching.. The neglected dimension [A]. In J. Alatis (ed.). Language Communication and Social Meaning [C]. Washington D. C. : Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics. 489-500. 被引量:1
  • 6Gentner, D. 1983. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy [J]. Cognitive Science 7: 155-170. 被引量:1
  • 7Gentner, D. 1988. Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift [J]. Child Development 59: 47-59. 被引量:1
  • 8Gentner, D. &C. Clement. 1988. Evidence for relational selectivity in the interpretation of analogy and metaphor [A]. In G. Bower (ed.). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation . Advances in Research and Theory [C]. New York: Academic Press. 307-358. 被引量:1
  • 9Gentner, D. & J. Colhoun. 2010. Analogical processes in human thinking and learning [A]. In B. Glatzeder et al. (eds.). Towards a Theory of Thinking: On Thinking [C]. Berlin: Springer. 被引量:1
  • 10Gentner, D. & P. Wolff. 1997. Alignment in the processing of metaphor [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 37: 331-355. 被引量:1

二级参考文献43

共引文献432

同被引文献354

引证文献31

二级引证文献145

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部