摘要
真伪不明时法官会面临着实体法适用不能的困境,必须通过某种方法加以克服。不适用法律规范说将"真伪不明"与"被驳回"在法律适用上同等对待,即都会导致实体法规范的不被适用,但却未给出充分的理由。独立于实体法规范的证明责任规范的理论构想,在解决真伪不明案件裁判依据的同时,又导致了法律适用上与实体法规范相脱节。只有将证明责任规范作为实体法的辅助规范,并将证明责任的方法论与内容分配相区分,才能真正解决真伪不明时的法律适用难题。在真伪不明的法律适用上,还应避免两种误区:即将证明责任规范判决等同于败诉判决,以及将法律问题不明等同于事实问题不明。
It must overcome the dilemma that the substantive law can＇t be applicable in non liquet by some method.On the Theory of Non-applicability of Legal Regulations,the conditions of ＂non liquet＂ and ＂rejection＂ are considered in the same way.That is,they will all lead to the inapplicability of substantive law.But no convincing argumentation is given.The law of Burden of Proof,as the adjudication norms when cases fall in non liquet,which be independent of substantive law,also leads to interfluve in application between them.Only the norms of burden of proof as supporting norms of substantive law,and distinguishing methodology and allotment function of the burden of proof,the dilemma of application of law in non liquet will be really resolved.In juridical practice of application of law,two mistaken ideas should be avoided,that is regard judgments by norms of burden of proof as judgments which failed in substantive law,and regard the unknown legal issues as the unknown facts.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第3期118-122,共5页
Legal Forum
基金
教育部人文社科规划项目<基层法院的司法决策>(09YJC820063)的阶段性成果
关键词
真伪不明
法律适用
证明责任规范
non liquet
application of law
norms of burden of proof
