摘要
目的:本文旨在将沉浸-反思问卷(Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire,RRQ)引入中国,并考察其在中国大学生样本中的信度和效度。方法:在6所高校中随机抽取1226名大学生完成测试,并在两周后对其中的150人进行重测。结果:①验证性因子分析显示,沉浸-反思两因子模型具有良好的结构效度,NNFI=0.974,IFI=0.978,CFI=0.978,RMSEA=0.077;②沉浸-反思问卷具有良好的项目鉴别度;③总量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.860,其中,沉浸为0.810,反思为0.837;④总量表的重测信度为0.657,其中,沉浸的为0.707,反思的为0.459;⑤沉浸与大五人格中N因素神经质呈正相关,反思与O因素开放性呈正相关;⑥沉浸与反思分量表均无性别差异。结论:沉浸-反思问卷中文版的信、效度达到测量学要求。
Objective：To measure the validity and reliability of the Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire applied in Chinese college students.Methods：1226 college students from 6 distinct universities participated,and 150 of them were retest after two weeks.Results：①In confirmatory analysis,NNFI=0.974,IFI=0.978,CFI=0.978,RMSEA=0.077;②Both rumination and reflection factors had acceptable item discrimination;③Cronbach＇s α coefficients of RRQ was 0.860,of which rumination was 0.810 and reflection was 0.837;④Test-retest reliability of RRQ was 0.657,of which rumination was 0.707 and reflection was 0.459（all Ps0.001）;⑤Rumination had significant correlation with neuroticism,while reflection had significant correlation with openness;⑥There were no gender difference in both rumination and reflection.Conclusion：The Chinese version of rumination-reflection questionnaire had acceptable psychometric quality.
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
2010年第6期701-703,690,共4页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金
“长江学者和创新团队发展计划资助”(IRT0710)
“北京师范大学自主科研基金资助项目(2009SC-3)”资助
关键词
沉浸-反思问卷
自我关注
神经质
开放性
Rumination-reflection questionnaire
Self-focused attention
Neuroticism
Openness
