摘要
中国古代宫廷用瓷的取得经历了"贡窑"、"制样需索"、"官窑"三种模式,时间上有先后也有重合。"官窑"是一种专称,由宫廷设置窑场,组织和管理生产并控制产品流向。从窑址发掘和文献记载的情况看,将废次品打碎后掩埋似乎并非官窑的一种制度,而是官窑处理废次品的一种偶然现象。南宋时,龙泉窑生产的黑胎厚釉青瓷与官窑产品非常相似,龙泉窑与官窑的关系需要重新审视。
In Chinese history the porcelain wares made exclusively for the imperial court were usually delivered in the following ways which might take place early or late,or overlapped in time——one is offered as Gong Wares (tribute wares),another is Zhi Yang Xu Suo (i.e.to assign the producers to make the wares for special demands after the given designs made by the imperial courts),the third is Guan wares (official wares).The term of Guan Yao here specially means the whole manufacture process was under the control of the imperial court from establishment of kilns to organization and management of production and circulation of the products.On the other hand,the excavated kiln sites and related documents suggest that breaking then burying the waste or defective products might not take place as a system,but occasional cases in Guan kiln.In the Southern Song Dynasty,the black bodied,thickly-glazed celadon wares of Longquan kiln were very much alike to Guan wares.There is an indication that both the kiln structure and wares of Jiaotanxia kiln somewhat have the common characteristics with what of Longquan kiln.Therefore,the relationship between Longquan kiln and Guan kiln needs to be reexamined.
出处
《故宫博物院院刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第5期16-25,共10页
Palace Museum Journal
关键词
官窑
打碎掩埋
龙泉窑
Guan Yao
breaking then burying
Longquan kiln
