期刊文献+

国际机制理论与国际法学的互动:从概念辨析到跨学科合作 被引量:6

The Interaction of International Regimes Theory and International Law Theory:From the Concepts Analysis to the Interdisciplinary Cooperation
原文传递
导出
摘要 国际关系理论与国际法学之间关系紧密,相辅相成,而国际关系理论中的国际机制理论是两个学科跨学科合作的桥梁或纽带。实际上,国际机制与国际法是一个相近甚至是重叠的概念,两个学科是从不同角度对相近乃至叠合的事物展开的不同分析,因而它们之间有着巨大的合作潜力与前景。然而,在兴起之初,国际机制理论的学者却刻意地将国际机制与国际法拉开距离,制造了两个学科之间的巨大鸿沟。鉴于此,澄清国际机制与国际法之间的区别与联系,以及考察两个学科进行合作的潜力与前景是为必要的工作。 The international relation theory and international law theory are closely connected,supplementing each other,and between which,the international regimes theory is the bridge or conjunction of the interdisciplinary cooperation.Actually,the international regimes and international law theory are two similar,or even overlapped,notions.They are the different analysis from different angles to the similar or overlapped issues,which can lead to great potential and prospects of their cooperation.However in the phase of emergence,the international regimes theorist deliberately enlarged the gap between the international regimes and international law.For such reason,it makes essential to clarify the differences and relations of the two disciplines,and also to contemplate the potential and prospects of interdisciplinary cooperation.
作者 刘志云
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《法学论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期54-60,共7页 Legal Forum
基金 教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"资助项目(NCET-08-0477)的阶段性成果
关键词 国际机制 国际法 跨学科合作 international Regimes international Law interdisciplinary cooperation
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Robert J. Beck, Anthony Clark Arend and Robert D. Vander Lugt ( eds. ). International Rules: Approaches from International Law and International Relations [ M ]. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc., 1996, p. 255. 被引量:1
  • 2Kenneth W. Abbott. Modern International Relations Theory: A Prospectus for International Lawyers [ J ]. Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 14, 1989, p. 338. 被引量:1
  • 3J. Craig Barker. International Law and International Relations [ M ]. London: Continuum, 2000. 被引量:1
  • 4Anne - Marie Burley. International Law and International Relations Theory : A Dual Agenda [ J ]. The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 87, No. 2, 1993. 被引量:1
  • 5John G. Ruggie. International Response to Technology: Concepts and Trends [ J ]. International Organization, Vol. 29, No. 3, 1975, p. 570. 被引量:1
  • 6Ernst Haas. Technological Self - Reliance for Latin America: the OAS Contribution [ J ]. International Organization, Vol. 34, No. 4, 1980, p. 553. 被引量:1
  • 7Stephen Krasner. Structural Cause and Regime Consequences : Regimes as Intervening Variables [ J ]. International Organization, Vol. 36, 1982, p. 186. 被引量:1
  • 8[美]罗伯特·基欧汉.霸权之后:世界政治经济中的合作与纷争[M].苏长和译.上海:上海人民出版社,2001. 被引量:9
  • 9William J. Aceves. Institutionalism Theory and International Legal Scholarship [ J ]. The American University Journal of International Law & Policy, Vol. 12, 1997, p. 242. 被引量:1
  • 10Byers, Custom. Power and Power of Rules : International Relations and Customary International Law [ M ]. Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 147 - 148. 被引量:1

共引文献13

同被引文献151

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部