期刊文献+

CIHD简明ICF核心要素量表的信度与效度的研究 被引量:5

The Reliability and Validity of the Brief ICF Core Sets for Chinese Patients with Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对慢性缺血性心脏病(CIHD)的国际功能、残疾与健康分类(ICF)核心要素表进行信度、效度评价,为中国冠心病患者的全面的功能评价提供特异性测量工具。方法:100例经冠状动脉造影检查证实为冠心病的患者,按照中国CIHD简明ICF核心要素量表、MacNew心脏病特异性问卷和医学结局研究简明调查表(SF-36)的评分规则进行评定。结果:中国CIHD简明ICF核心要素量表的4个成份中,Cronbachα系数在身体功能和活动与参与两方面的结果为0.834~0.839,具有较高的内部一致性;Kendall’sW值达到0.818,且P=0.000,评测者间结果具有很好的一致性。CIHD简明ICF核心要素表与SF-36和MacNew表之间的spearson系数为0.567与0.552(P<0.01);表示有较好相关性。结论:采用中国CIHD简明ICF核心要素量表评定CIHD患者的功能是可靠和有效的,建议进一步推广使用。 Objective:To investigate the reliability and validity of the brief ICF Core Sets for Chinese patients with chronic ischemic heart disease (CIHD). Methods: One hundred patients with CIHD confirmed by coronary angiography were assessed by brief ICF Core Sets for Chinese patients with CIHD, the MacNew Heart Disease Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire (MacNew), and the MOS item short from health survey (SF-36). Results:The brief ICF Core Sets for Chinese patients with CIHD were highly accepted. The brief ICF Core Sets for Chinese patients with CIHD had perfect substantial interater reliability (kendall's W=0. 818). Body function and activity and participation had good internal consistency (Cronbacha 0. 834-0. 839). There was concurrent validity for the brief ICF Core Sets with MacNew and SF- 36. Conclusion: The brief ICF Core Sets for Chinese patients with CIHD has good reliability and validity, and it is a good comprehensive functional measurement scale for patients with CIHD.
出处 《中国康复》 2009年第1期26-27,共2页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation
关键词 慢性缺血性心脏病 国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF) ICF核心要素 简明ICF核心要素 调查问卷 chronic ischemic heart disease international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) ICF core set reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献22

  • 1陈和年.生存质量测量的方法学研究及其应用[J].中国学术期刊文献,1996,2(7):114-114. 被引量:3
  • 2许军,国外医学.社会医学分册,1998年,15卷,3期,105页 被引量:1
  • 3魏朝晖,国外医学.社会医学分册,1997年,14卷,4期,145页 被引量:1
  • 4陈和年,中国学术期刊文摘,1996年,2卷,7期,114页 被引量:1
  • 5Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, et al. A brief selfadministered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index) [J]. Am J Cardiol, 1989, 64 (10):651-654. 被引量:1
  • 6Brosson B, Ifer J, Hays RD. The Swedish health-related quality of life survey (SWED-QUAL) [J]. Qual Life Res, 1993, 2:33-45. 被引量:1
  • 7Hickey AM, Bury G, O'Boyle CA et al. A new shory form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): Application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS [J]. BMJ, 1996, 313: 29. 被引量:1
  • 8Fekkes M, Kamphuis RP, Ottenkamp J, et al. Health-related quality of life in young adults with minor congenital heart disease [J].Psycho health, 2001, 16: 239. 被引量:1
  • 9Ferrans CE, Dowers MJ. Quality of life index: development and psychometric properties [J]. Adv nurs sci, 1985, 8: 15-24. 被引量:1
  • 10Badia X, Roca-Cusachs A, Dalfo A, et al. Validation of the short form of the Spanish hypertension quality of life questionnaire(MINICHAL) [J]. ClinTher, 2002, 24 (12): 2137-2154. 被引量:1

共引文献618

同被引文献117

引证文献5

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部