期刊文献+

公司治理演进趋势主要争论点述评

下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前,全球化背景下各种公司治理模式是走向趋同还是保持存续(即多元)的问题,是比较公司治理学派争论的核心问题。趋同论者认为全球化背景下的制度竞争将促使公司治理向效率较高的模式趋同,而存续论者则认为路径依赖和制度互补性将导致公司治理长期存续。即使是在趋同论内部,由于受政治体制特别是意识形态,如民族伦理特性所导致的差异影响,对于趋同的实现形式和趋同于何种模式的争论也难以弥合而将长期存续。
作者 孙光焰
出处 《湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期82-86,共5页 Journal of Hubei University(Philosophy and Social Science)
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目:06BFX030
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1王化争.股权结构、环境差异与公司治理模式演进[J].文史哲,2005(5):163-168. 被引量:3
  • 2李明辉.公司治理模式会趋同吗?[J].世界经济研究,2005(10):79-83. 被引量:2
  • 3SCHMID, R.H., G.Spindler, .Path Dependence, Corporate Governance and Complementarity[J].International Finance, 2002,5 ( 3 ). 被引量:1
  • 4BRAENDLE, U., C., J.On the Convergence of National Corporate Govemance[EB/OL].(2004-04-01 )Noll, April 1, http ://www.ssrn.com/abstract. 被引量:1
  • 5GILSON,R. ,J.Globalizing Corporate Governance: Convergence of Form or Function.Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 192; and Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 174[EB/OL].( 2000-05 ), http ://www.ssm.com/abstract=229517. 被引量:1
  • 6KOLE, S., K.Lehn, 1997, Deregulation, the Evolution of Corporate Governance Structure, and Surviva[J].American Economic Review, 1997, (87). 被引量:1
  • 7CHEFFINS,B.R..Corporate Law and Ownership Structure:A Darwinian Link?[EB/OL].http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=317661. 被引量:1
  • 8HANSMANN,H.B.,R.H.KRAKMAN.The End of History For Corporate Law.Yale Law School Working Paper No.235;NYU Working Paper No.013;Harvard Law School Discussion Paper No.280;Yale SOM Working Paper No.ICF-00-09 [EB/OL].(2000-01)http://ssrn.com/abstract=204528. 被引量:1
  • 9Henry Hansmann.The Ownership of Enterprises[M].Cambridge,Mass. :Harvard University Press, 1996. 被引量:1
  • 10杰弗里·N·戈登,马克·J·罗.公司治理:趋同与存续[M].赵玲,刘凯,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2006. 被引量:3

二级参考文献45

  • 1K.Z.波兹南斯基,刘耀辉.全球化的理论与实践[J].国外理论动态,2002(8):1-6. 被引量:6
  • 2青木昌彦 奥野正宽.“1996.经济体制的比较制度分析”中译本[M].中国发展出版社,1999年版.. 被引量:1
  • 3Bebchuk, L. A. and M. J. Roe, October 1999. "A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance". Stanford Law Review 52: PP.127-170. http://ssm.com/abstract=202748. 被引量:1
  • 4Braendle, U. C. and J. Noll, April 1, 2004. "On the Convergence of National Corporate Governance Systems".http://ssm.eom/abstraet=506522 . 被引量:1
  • 5Cheffins, B. R., 2002. "Corporate Law and Ownership Structure: A Darwinian Link?". http://ssm.com/abstract =317661 . 被引量:1
  • 6Coffee, J. C., September 2000. "Convergence and its Critics: What are the Preconditions to the Separation of Ownership and Control?" Columbia Law and EconomicsWorking Paper No. 179. http://ssm.com/abstract=241782 . 被引量:1
  • 7Coffee, J. C., February 1999."The Future as History: The Prospects for Global Convergence in Corporate Governance and Its Implications". Columbia Law School Center for Law and Economic Studies Working Paper No. 144. http://ssrn.com/abstract= 142833 . 被引量:1
  • 8Gilson, R. J., May 2000."Globalizing Corporate Governance: Convergence of Form or Function". Stanford Law and Economies Olin Working Paper No. 192: and Columbia Law and Economies Working Paper No. 174.http://ssm.com/abstraet=229517 . 被引量:1
  • 9Guillén, M F., 2000. "Corporate Governance and Globalization: Is There Convergence Across Countries?" Workingpaper, http://wwwmanagement.wharton.upenn.edu/guillen/. 被引量:1
  • 10Guillén, M. F., September 1999."Corporate Governance and Globalization: Arguments and Evidence against Convergence". A Working Paper of the Reginald H. Jones Center.http://jonescenter.wharton.upenn.edu/papers/1999/wp99-11.pdf. 被引量:1

共引文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部