摘要
对朱熹和张载哲学有三种代表性的诠释范式:冯友兰式、牟宗三式、张岱年式。他们难免有以西套中、强求逻辑义理的一贯彻底性所带来的简单化和片面化的弊病。宋明哲学除了综合佛、道,还综合汉代、魏晋以及先秦诸子思想。多种思想来源和新的"综合",使宋明哲学、理学体系往往呈现内在矛盾,天道观与心性论的矛盾更为突出。理学与心学亦往往你中有我、我中有你。由天道观转到以心性论为主轴,经历了很长的过程,至朱熹晚年基本完成,到王阳明才彻底完成。如何如实地揭示宋明哲学的内在复杂性及特质,是中国哲学史研究所应努力的。
There are three representative patterns so far to interpret Zhu Xi and Zhang Zai＇s Philosophy,namely Feng Youlan＇s pattern,Mou Zengsan＇s pattern and Zhang Dainian＇s pattern.All these patterns are deficient due to inevitable simplification and partiality caused either by putting a Chinese peg into a Western hole or by forcing their views into a consistent and complete framework.In face,Chinese philosophy in the Song and the Ming Dynasty synthesized not only Buddhism and Taoism but also miscellaneous ideological trends in the pre-Qin days,the Han Dynasties and the Wei and the Jin Dynasty.As a result,the conversion of Chinese philosophy from the view of heavenly law to the view of mind as the mainstream theory witnessed a prolonged process before it took a basic shape in the late days of Zhu Xi and a final shape in Wang Yangming＇s day.Thus,great efforts should be made to reveal the complexity and characteristics of Chinese philosophy in the Song and the Ming Dynasty.
出处
《陕西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第4期42-50,共9页
Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
宋明理学
实在论
已知之理
存有
逻辑一贯性
Confucianism in the Song and the Ming Dynasty
realism
self-comprehended idea
existence
logical unity
